Sunday, October 14, 2012
Saturday, October 13, 2012
The Most Universally Liked/Admired U.S. Book
More than sixty years after its publication, TKAM is still 500 on Amazon and of the more than 2500 reviews, the majority are 5 star. It is very rare for people to agree so completely about a book that most of us read as teenagers. I read it again a few years ago and liked it even more.
What other books are almost universally admired? What books are people most passionate about? What book never gets the cold shoulder?
How I Came to Write This Poem/Story
I wrote "Hushed" this past February, after Thomas Pluck invited me to contribute to
the PROTECTORS anthology. The poem is narrated by an older cousin who is
jealous of a younger one until he sees bruises on the boy's arm.
It was sparked by a years-old memory of seeing bruises on my own cousin's arm. When I asked him how the bruises happened, he wouldn't tell me, and he was very scared I might tell someone else. I had heard rumors his father was abusive, but unless he admitted to the beating, no one would believe me--especially since our relationship as children was contentious.
My cousin and I are on good terms now. He's married, has a good job, and owns his own home. If the rumors I still hear about his father are true, I would have turned my back, but my cousin is more compassionate, so his father remains an albatross.
I'm glad to turn this bad experience into a poem that will go to protect children. I'm also glad to tell you how my cousin is doing now. Thank you, Patti.
Gerald So
CHECK OUT MY REVIEW OF THE MASTER at Crimepree Cinema.
It was sparked by a years-old memory of seeing bruises on my own cousin's arm. When I asked him how the bruises happened, he wouldn't tell me, and he was very scared I might tell someone else. I had heard rumors his father was abusive, but unless he admitted to the beating, no one would believe me--especially since our relationship as children was contentious.
My cousin and I are on good terms now. He's married, has a good job, and owns his own home. If the rumors I still hear about his father are true, I would have turned my back, but my cousin is more compassionate, so his father remains an albatross.
I'm glad to turn this bad experience into a poem that will go to protect children. I'm also glad to tell you how my cousin is doing now. Thank you, Patti.
Gerald So
In Dreams was lifted from the MFA thesis I’m writing, a fictional memoir currently titled The 2nd Coming. It has been edited down and names have been removed. As best I can remember it, it is a true story. I never considered writing about this particular experience until I began writing the fictional memoir for school last semester. I had already changed my thesis twice after two semesters. Although
I had tried many times to write about some of the more painful issues
from my past, especially in theatre form, I could never sustain anything
long enough to feel comfortable continuing. After reading Bright Lights, Big City, by Jay McInerney, I tried second person and found I could finish what I had started. It remains a work in progress, but much more developed with each passing opportunity to settle in and write. I’ve
already gone beyond the word count requirements for my thesis, but why
let that stop me (said the SOB arrogant enough to title a memoir,
fictional or otherwise, The 2nd Coming)? It
is nothing profound, that’s for sure, but there’s a nuthouse stay and
some unfortunate family dynamics that are sometimes sad and often funny. The fictional memoir will cover birth to a first wedding at the age of twenty-one, with occasional projections into the future. It
touches on the influence of religion in a somewhat irreverent family,
growing up in the racial hotbed Canarsie was during the late 60’s/early
70’s, a Mob influence within family, and ultimately the collapse of
family. And, yes, the current title is as ironic as it reads.
Charlie Stella
CHECK OUT MY REVIEW OF THE MASTER at Crimepree Cinema.
Friday, October 12, 2012
The Summing Up, Friday, October 12, 2012
Thanks for all the great reviews today. I had to leave the house at noon so I will add others later.
The Summing Up, Friday, October 13, 2012
Patti Abbott Peril at End House
Sergio Angelini Unfinished Portrait
Yvette Banek, So Many Steps to Death
Joe Barone, Hercule Poirot's Christmas
Brian Busby, Crazy to Kill, Ann Cardwell
Bill Crider, A Talent to Deceive: An Appreciation of Agatha Christie, Robert Barnard
Ed Gorman, Body in the Library
Dorothy Hayes, A Sketch of Anna Katherine Green and her ties to Agatha Christie
Jerry House, Akhnaton
Randy Johnson , The Case of the Perfect Maid, Poirot and the Regatta Mystery
Nick Jones, Christie Dust Jackets of Interest
Lois Karlin, A Tribute to Agatha
George Kelley, The Tuesday Club Murders
Rob Kitchin, Death in the Clouds
B.V. Lawson, The Labours of Hercules
Steve Lewis, TV movie of Murder in Mesopotamia
Todd Mason, Sancutary and SPY: THE FUNNY YEARS edited by Graydon Carter & Kurt Andersen
Jeff Meyerson,The ABC Murders
Neer, Sparkingf Cyanide
J.F. Norris, The Hound of Death
Patrick Ohl-see Kevin Tipple, The Murder at the Vicarage
Richard Pangburn , A Chess Problem
Deb Pfeifer, Endless Night
James Reasoner, The Secret Adversary
Richard Robinson, The Clocks
Kerrie Smith, Agatha Christie Reading Challenge
Prashant Trikannad, The Secret Adversary
And other Forgotten Books
Scott Cupp, Wind Angels, Leigh Kennedy
Martin Edwards, Nightmare, Lynn Brock
Curt Evans , The Affair in Death Valley, Clifford Knight
Nick Jones, The Big H, Bryan Peters
Evan Lewis , Ready to Burn, Carroll John Daly
Richard Pangburn, The Eighth Circle, Stanley Ellin
Ron Scheer, The Lost Cabin Mine, Frederick Niven
Michael Slind,You'll Die Next, Harry Whittington
TomCat, Blind Drift, Cyde Clason
Friday's Forgotten Books, October 12, 2012-AGATHA CHRISTIE
Check out her numbers on Amazon today and she is still outselling most contemporary writers. But I doubt I need to tell any of you this.
Kerrie Smith (below) extends an invitation to link reviews to her caravan this month. Read her link to see how.
(Review by Deb)
About
me: After being a technical writer for the better part of twenty
years, I was a stay-at-home mom for a while. About ten years ago, I
went back to work in the public school system. I currently work in a
special ed classroom with severely-autistic students. It's challenging
work, but also very rewarding. I love to read across all genres, but
mysteries are my favorite.
I
realize how improbable it would be to know Agatha Christie solely
through this one novel, first published in 1967; but, in the unlikely
event that you were only aware of Christie as the author of ENDLESS
NIGHT, you would be hard-pressed to connect her with the creator of Miss
Marple, Hercule Poirot, and the village "cozies" with which her name is
most often associated. ENDLESS NIGHT is atypical for Christie, a novel
in which frank sexual passion is a driving force and a vague
supernatural menace permeates the atmosphere. It is the closest thing
to noir that Christie ever wrote.
In
first-person narration, we meet Michael Rogers, a twenty-something
working-class drifter who has held multiple jobs, always losing them
because of his inability to control his restless, impulsive nature (today
he'd certainly be diagnosed with ADD/ADHD). Despite his poverty,
Michael is a man who enjoys the finer things and has a great eye for
art, although he obviously cannot afford the abstract canvases that move
him. He spends money when he has it (sometimes by betting on long
shots at the track) and has no desire to follow his mother's admonition
to settle down at one job and start saving for the future.
While
he is working as a chauffeur in Europe, Michael meets Rudolf Santonix, a
world-famous architect. Despite the gulf between their backgrounds and
professions, an unexpected friendship springs up between the two
because of Michael's innate understanding and appreciation of Santonix's
artistic vision--which, Santonix freely admits, requires a great deal
of money to implement. Later, while working in Devon, Michael becomes
enchanted by a piece of land known as "Gipsy's Acre." According to
local lore, the land was cursed by the band of gypsies who were driven
off it years before. In the passages describing Gipsy's Acre,
Christie's powers are in full effect--allowing us to discern something
ominous and unsettling in the mysterious wind-swept beauty of the land.
During
a subsequent visit to Gipsy's Acre, Michael encounters a young American
woman named Ellie and they strike up a conversation. This leads to
several dates, although they meet secretly to avoid interference from
Ellie's protective and disapproving family. As soon as Ellie comes of
age and into a large inheritance, she and Michael marry. There are some
interesting scenes as Michael discovers the extent of Ellie's wealth
and meets the people it takes to manage such a vast amount of money,
particularly Ellie's urbane lawyer, Andrew Lippincott.
Michael
also has to navigate the tricky move from English working-class to
upper-class (noticing, for example, that the shabby clothes and
broken-down vehicle of a neighbor, Major Phillpot, do not prevent him
from being the community's de facto social leader). Despite the class
snobbery that was often apparent in Christie's books, here she lets us
feel some sympathy for the fish-out-of-water Michael as he attempts to
come to grips with who he is in the society he has entered as a result
of his wife's money. I would guess that Agatha Christie chose to make
Ellie an American in part to leave Michael alone in dealing with these
issues; being an American, Ellie is less aware of the difficulties of
transcending the English class structure.
Knowing
Michael's love of Gipsy's Acre, Ellie purchases the land for them and
hires Rudolf Santonix to build their dream house on the site. But
things start to go wrong: A local woman repeatedly warns Ellie that she
will suffer if she stays on Gipsy's Acre; Michael argues constantly
with Gretchen, Ellie's bossy best friend who has come to stay for an
open-ended visit; Andrew Lippincott asks Michael enigmatic questions
about his background and acquaintances; and anonymous acts of vandalism
are committed, all of which seem aimed at driving the couple out of
their home and off Gipsy's Acre.
Amid
this turmoil, a death occurs: a tragic accident--or is it something
more sinister? I really can't say much beyond this without giving away
the rest of the plot, especially a very surprising (to me, at least)
twist. Some readers who are more perceptive than I may guess the
"shocking revelation" before it is explained, but I must admit I was
caught off guard the first time I read it. This is one of those books
that makes you want to start rereading immediately after finishing to
see how Christie makes excellent use of what Robert Barnard calls her
"talent to deceive" as misdirection and casually-dropped clues (not to
mention a few red herrings) lead us away from what is actually
happening.
So,
if you're in the mood for a Christie where the solution to the crime
does not involve missing buttons, broken shoe buckles, or clocks being
turned back ten minutes (not that there's anything wrong with that),
ENDLESS NIGHT is the book for you.
Incidently,
there was a fairly good movie adaptation of ENDLESS NIGHT made in 1972,
featuring Hywel Bennett, Hayley Mills, Britt Ekland, and George Sanders
(in one of his last roles). It is available for instant viewing on
Netflix, but I would strongly recommend not watching it until you've
read the book.
PERIL AT END HOUSE, Patti Abbott
This is an excellent book in which to find a prime example of the plotting that made Christie a master of a certain type of mystery. Her ingenuity and puzzle- master mind is on display in aces at PERIL AT END HOUSE.Detective Hercule Poirot and Captain Arthur Hastings are spending a weekend at a hotel in a seaside town in Cornwall. Poirot is once again claiming to his friend that his days as a detective are at an end when they meet the novel's central character. Nick Buckley is a young woman who can ill afford the house that looms in the distance, End House. She confesses to Poirot that she has met with three near misses lately and Poirot immediately decides these incidents are not accidents but attempts on her life. Nick's wealthy, aristocratic inner circle comes under immediate scrutiny and a distant cousin is brought to End House to provide Nick with protection. Before very long, Maggie, the cousin, mistaken for her Nick, lies dead. There are letters, wills, eavesdropping, addicts and all the classic tropes the classic British mystery excelled in. END HOUSE is a wonder in its plotting. What it lacks in character, it makes up for in its ability to keep you guessing and interested. Oh for a tenth of her ability to plot.
Agatha Christie, THE ABC Murders (1936) Jeff Meyerson
I had a tough time deciding which Christie book to write about today. Should it be the first I'd read, And Then There Were None (certainly a fine choice) or her first novel, The Mysterious Affair at Styles (1920) or one of her most famous, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd or Murder on the Orient Express?
Or perhaps I should go with one of the short story collections. I read
most of these a very long time ago. We first went to London on our
belated honeymoon in April of 1971 and while there we saw The Mousetrap (then in its 19th year!) and bought two of her books more or less at random, the late Poirot book The Clocks and the better Miss Marple The Body in the Library. I've read over 80 of her books, mostly in the first half of the 1970's. In the end I decided on this one.
The ABC Murders is not your typical
Poirot book, despite the presence of his Watson, Captain Hastings, and
Inspector Japp. For one thing, there are different points of view,
including Hastings, the unknown serial killer, and a man who seems to be
the prime suspect, Alexander Bonaparte Cust. A series of murders takes
place, each in alphabetical order, first Alice Ascher in Andover. Each
has a copy of the ABC railway guide by the body. And Alexander
Bonaparte Cust (initials ABC), a traveling salesman prone to blackouts,
was in each of the places on the day in question. Could he be the
"madman" who is sending Poirot taunting notes?
[I suppose I should give a SPOILER ALERT here for those who haven't read it.]
Naturally, Poirot figures out that the killer isn't
Cust or a random madman but a very clever (if not quite clever enough)
killer with a definite motive. If you've watched any television crime
shows I can guarantee you've seen the ABC pattern used over and over
again, and an astute reader and viewer will be able to spot it. I am
not claiming Christie invented it (I have no idea who did) but she did
perfect it here. And I think I will stop here before further spoiling a
book you should definitely read.
Christie wrote a number of classics during her long
career and this is definitely one of them. Her books do not need to be
read in order but if you're picking out a few to try, put this on your
list. Jeff Meyerson
THE BODY IN THE LIBRARY, Ed Gorman
Ed Gorman is the author of the Dev Conrad and Sam McCain series of crime fiction books. You can find him right here.
Some of the reviews of this novel, written at the time of its publication, will make you smile. Replace Poirot with an old woman named Miss Jane Marple? How"unrealistic" she is as a detective. As if Poirot is an exemplar of hardbitten realism. (I've always preferred Jane to Hercule.)
This is my favorite Christie novel for three reasons. First she obviously set out to ransack the cliche set-up of the mysterious body found in an unlikely place, in this case the library of an upright, upper class couple whose social reputation is beyond question.
Second because in looking into the background of the dead young woman Christie examines both the class system--not only is the young woman's corpse a problem, so is her lower order upbringing, as disturbing in its way as death itself--and the show business life she lead.
Which leads into point number Three. Suspects include people at a nearby posh hotel where the dead woman was (among other duties) a substitute dancer in the nightly cabaret. Christie's social eye and ear are as good for the realm of lower order performers as they are for pompous upper class members who pay to see them.
But Christie being Christie she has to do a little trashing of the moderne which takes the form of a young Londoner who uses his home here for wild assignations and parties. He is connected to the film industry which makes him a fitting target for Christie's satiric side. Film industry? You mean boorish idlers who deflower naive young women and plunder otherwise happy marriages?
As I mentioned some of the initial reviews knocked the novel for its unrealistic detective (Jane Marple) and plotting. I ran across a quote from that most excellent writer Robert Barnard that makes the case for the book very well. "Bravura performance on a classic situation. St Mary Mead regulars figure in the case, pleasantly diversified by fashionable seaside hotel guests and the film crowd. If you think what happens to the body after death is unlikely, try the more 'realistic' P.D. James' An Unsuitable Job for a Woman."
THE BODY IN THE LIBRARY, Ed Gorman
Ed Gorman is the author of the Dev Conrad and Sam McCain series of crime fiction books. You can find him right here.
Some of the reviews of this novel, written at the time of its publication, will make you smile. Replace Poirot with an old woman named Miss Jane Marple? How"unrealistic" she is as a detective. As if Poirot is an exemplar of hardbitten realism. (I've always preferred Jane to Hercule.)
This is my favorite Christie novel for three reasons. First she obviously set out to ransack the cliche set-up of the mysterious body found in an unlikely place, in this case the library of an upright, upper class couple whose social reputation is beyond question.
Second because in looking into the background of the dead young woman Christie examines both the class system--not only is the young woman's corpse a problem, so is her lower order upbringing, as disturbing in its way as death itself--and the show business life she lead.
Which leads into point number Three. Suspects include people at a nearby posh hotel where the dead woman was (among other duties) a substitute dancer in the nightly cabaret. Christie's social eye and ear are as good for the realm of lower order performers as they are for pompous upper class members who pay to see them.
But Christie being Christie she has to do a little trashing of the moderne which takes the form of a young Londoner who uses his home here for wild assignations and parties. He is connected to the film industry which makes him a fitting target for Christie's satiric side. Film industry? You mean boorish idlers who deflower naive young women and plunder otherwise happy marriages?
As I mentioned some of the initial reviews knocked the novel for its unrealistic detective (Jane Marple) and plotting. I ran across a quote from that most excellent writer Robert Barnard that makes the case for the book very well. "Bravura performance on a classic situation. St Mary Mead regulars figure in the case, pleasantly diversified by fashionable seaside hotel guests and the film crowd. If you think what happens to the body after death is unlikely, try the more 'realistic' P.D. James' An Unsuitable Job for a Woman."
Joe Barone
Bill Crider
Dorothy Hayes
Jerry House
Randy Johnson
Nick Jones
Lois Karlin
George Kelley
Rob Kitchin
B.V. Lawson
Steve Lewis
Todd Mason
Neer
J.F. Norris
Patrick Ohl-see Kevin Tipple
Richard Pangburn
James Reasoner
Richard Robinson
Kerrie Smith
Kevin Tipple
Prashant Trikannad
And other Forgotten Books
Brian Busby
Scott Cupp
Martin Edwards
Curt Evans
Nick Jones
Evan Lewis
Richard Pangburn
Ron Scheer
Michael Slind
TomCat
Thursday, October 11, 2012
My Life at the Theater: Dubliners
This was performed at the Gaiety Theater in Dublin two weeks ago. It was an amazing production where more than half of the stories in Joyce's DUBLINERS were magically brought to life almost solely through his words and a few changes of costume. Seeing it in the city of Dublin was just terrific.
Adapted by Michael West and Annie Ryan . Four performances of this classic were not nearly enough. I have to assume it will play elsewhere. It would be a travesty if it were not.
Ireland
How I Came to Write This Story: Nigel Bird
The Rhythm Of Life -BOTH BARRELS
The story behind the
story
Shotgun
Honey has a reputation that’s grown quickly in a fairly short space of
time.
I
have no doubt that this is due to the editorial prowess of the team involved,
but it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly what their secret might be.
The
stories are always well-written and engaging as you might hope, but for me
there is an invisible thread that stitches work together as part of the Shotgun
Honey banner. It has to do with the
emotional power that’s generated and the subtle ways it is expressed in such a
short space – remember that the stories weigh in at around the 600 word mark.
When
I was invited to submit to the anthology Both Barrels I was excited, honoured
and more than a little intimidated.
For
me I felt the need to pull something out of the bag that told a story but
carried that emotional engagement.
Whether I achieved it or not isn’t for me to say, though the feeling I
was hoping to project was one I felt during its writing.
The
story combines 2 strands of ideas.
The
first relates to a hitch-hiking holiday I had in northern France when I was
19. My friend, Gareth, and I had a
wonderful time where the richness of experience has never really left me. Among the things that have stuck around is a
love for fountains. It seemed that in
every town there was a fountain that would become our focal point for lunching
or reading or passing the evenings. The
sound of the water and the position in the towns made them the perfect places
to sit. The French have so many more fountains than we do in Britain and I’ve
celebrated that every time I’ve been over there since. A fountain, then, was something I wanted to
bring in to this work.
Now,
fountains being one of my favourite things doesn’t suggest much in the way of
crime fiction. If anything my feelings
would be more in line with the writing of a romantic piece – in some ways it is
a romance story – but something more was
needed.
Enter
strand 2.
There’s
a thing that some children do that I find fascinating. They spend an age painting a wonderful
picture or creating a lovely drawing or writing a story or building with blocks
and then they destroy it. Completely
trash the thing – throw the paint, scribble, rub out – just get rid of it as if
it didn’t exist.
I
suppose we call it self-destruction when we apply this to adults, something I
know quite a lot about.
And
there was the story. Along comes a young
man to a fountain and find a beautiful girl reading a book. The weather’s great and there’s a Technicolor
wash over it all. It’s almost perfect,
yet all the young man can do is admire the scene and then scribble all over the
thing until none of it is visible any more.
That’s
the story. They’re the things behind
it. That’s what I was thinking. If you read it, I’d love to know whether it
works for you or not.
I’m
proud to be part of this one and I wish the Shotgun Honey team all the best
with their future efforts.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
How I Came to Publish This Book: COME EASY-GO EASY/ IN A VAIN SHADOW

Upon Publishing James Hadley Chase by Greg Shepard, Stark Press
I first encountered James Hadley Chase when I was a
teenager. The book was Dead Ringer,
published in the U.S. by Ace Books in 1969. A woman in a dark bikini and vivid
blue eyeliner sprawls across the cover. Blonde, dead and alluring. There’s a
quote at the top of the page: “Far and away the best writer of thrillers in the
English language.” The back cover suggests that the reader would be well served
to check out Chase’s previously published No
Orchids for Miss Blandish, which is precisely what I did. It hit me like a
raw-boned fist.
A few years pass. By now I had collected quite a few of the
old British Panther and Corgi editions of Chase’s books, with those slightly
cheesy pin-up-girl covers. Also by now, Chase had become one of my guilty
pleasures. I knew he wasn’t considered in the same realm as Chandler or
Hammett, nor even mentioned in the same breath as MacDonald and Thompson. But
by god, whenever I picked up one of his books, I was always hooked from the
first page, and I always raced to the end, through all of Chase’s twists and
turns, to see if the “hero” gets away with it this time. He hardly ever did.
Usually the Chase hero is a hapless scheming schmuck who
gets what he deserves, but he usually has to go through hell to get there.
Yeah, a real noir kind of a hero.
But Chase is something of an anomaly in the States. The
author’s real name is René Brabazon Raymond, and he’s quite thoroughly British.
However, he decided at the outset of his career to write American hardboiled
thrillers. So, armed with a dictionary of slang, he cranked out books like Kiss My Fist, I’ll Get You for This, You’re
Lonely When You’re Dead and Strictly
for Cash. By the end of his career in 1985, he had only visited the U.S. a
handful of times, mostly the East Coast.
In fact, one of the things that puts off certain American
readers is the occasional British term amidst all that hardboiled talk. Chase
set most of the books in areas like Florida and Los Angeles, so when you
encounter a “boot” being opened in a “car park,” it jars you a little. But
these little slips never get in the way of the story. They’re just there to
remind you that Chase is not the American hardboiled writer that he seems.
Anyway, more years pass and it had been a long time since I
had read one of my James Hadley Chase books. They just sat there on the shelf,
tempting me, but there was always something else to read first. As the
publisher of Stark House, I had been corresponding with a reader who turned out
to be quite a Chase fan. He emailed me an annotated list of some of his
favorites and suggested that if I hadn’t read them yet, I would be in for a
treat. So I went on a quest of rediscovery. And discovered that he was right.
There were some killer stories here, all of them out of print. Chase had
written close to 90 books—perhaps I should consider reprinting two of them.
I got my Associate Editor, Rick Ollerman, fired up about it.
He, too, turned out to be a Chase fan. Tracking down the agent who represented
the Chase Estate turned out to be as simple as writing to House of Stratus, who
had reprinted a bunch of Chase books in England. Chase’s son controlled the
estate, and his literary agent was happy to consider my proposal.
So, what books to publish? A daunting task. It seemed too
easy to reprint No Orchids and its
sequel, The Flesh of the Orchid. I
never seem to go for the obvious choices anyway. I toyed with the notion of
bringing back some of the really obscure titles like Miss Callaghan Comes to Grief, Lady—Here’s
Your Wreath or Blondes’ Requiem. But
I finally decided to settle on one of my personal favorites from 1960, Come Easy—Go Easy, and pair it with one
of Chase’s rare British mysteries, In a
Vain Shadow, to offer a broad perspective of Chase’s work.
Pocket Books had made an attempt to popularize James Hadley
Chase in the U.S. back in the 1970’s, and Come
Easy had actually been reprinted by Pocket back in 1974. But those Pocket
editions have become fairly rare. And In
a Vain Shadow, originally published under the Chase pseudonym “Raymond
Marshall,” had never been published here at all, with its last Corgi paperback
edition dating from the late 1970’s.
The set-up for Come
Easy—Go Easy is deceptively simple as any con-on-the-run story. A fellow
gets involved in a botched theft, and is sent to a horrible chain gang prison.
But he’s got a plan, and soon finds himself involved in a late night prison
break. After the horrors of that situation, after our hero Chet has
successfully escaped, he needs some place to hide out. He comes across an old
guy who owns a diner and gas station in Nevada on the last stop through the
desert. The old guy hires Chet as his assistant. But wait, Chase is only
getting warmed up. Because the old guy has a sultry wife—well, of course he
does—who seems to resent the hell out of Chet’s presence, and goes out of her
way to be rude to him. And so it goes from there. I don’t want to give the
whole book away, but suffice to say, the dust never settles on Chet for long.
There’s a hell of a lot of conniving to come.
In a Vain Shadow
involves a character named Frank who takes on a job as a bodyguard but is all
the time trying to figure out how he can rip off a cache of diamonds from the
guy he’s protecting. This one’s got a femme fatale, too. And nothing goes right
for Frank. We read the story from his point of view and there’s always one
piece of the puzzle that’s missing. There’s always something that keeps Frank
from the treasure he feels should be his. Because try as he might, he can’t
quite stay ahead of that femme.
And this is what I enjoy so much about Chase’s thrillers. He
keeps me guessing. He keeps shifting the action around and taking it in a new
direction. George MacDonald Fraser, author of the Flashman series, said once
about Chase, “He just keeps me reading.” The critic for The Observer called him “insanely readable” and the New Statesman considered Chase the
“master of the art of deception.”
The new Stark House edition of Come Easy—Go Easy / In a Vain Shadow was published in April of 2012
with a new introduction by Rick Ollerman and a complete bibliography of Chase’s
90+ works. There is also a great James Hadley Chase website at http://www.hadleychase.co.nr, manned
by a die-hard fan named Dr. P. C. Sarkar. It’s filled with information and
comments on all the individual books, and I recommend it to anyone with more
than a passing interest. This is where I discovered that Chase had written a
play called Last Page, which was
turned into an excellent Hammer film, Man
Bait, featuring Peter Cushing. And yes, it too will keep you on the edge of
your seat.
Stark House Press
www.starkhousepress.com
Tuesday, October 09, 2012
What the Internet Has Brought to Me.
We just spent some lovely time with Rob Kitchin and his wife, Cora, in Maynooth, Ireland, home of the National University of Ireland. Phil was the keynote speaker at a conference Rob arranged on the American election and the high point for me was spending two lovely evenings talking most crime fiction with Rob and Cora.
I have been rather aggressive about trying to meet people I know via the blog community and this meeting worked out well for Phil as well since Rob is a university professor with many common interests. I have met many, many people at crime fiction conferences that I exchanged a few words with, but I especially treasure the people I have been able to spend more than a few minutes with.
Friends like Terrie Moran who made us so welcome in Florida when we were considering spending a winter there a few years back. Terrie is a person we struck an immediate rapport with-who wouldn't?
Or Sandra Scoppettone who traveled for hours to meet me for lunch in New York a few years ago. She has continued to give me advice and succor ever since.
People like Naomi Johnson who took an afternoon off to show me Columbus and take me to lunch. The same goes for Margot Kinberg and Barrie Summy out in San Diego.
Or Bonnie Lawson who shared coffee and book talk with me in D.C.
George Kelley and his wife, Diane, have met us at Niagara on the Lake for a play and bookstore visits and had dinner with us twice. Jeff and Jackie Meyerson have done that too as well as being our companions on trips to New York. A great tour of Brooklyn was part of the fun.
Cullen Gallagher has met up with us in New York and Philadelphia and is as charming as he seems online. Kieran Shea has exchanged Ocean City, New Jersey memories with me on more than one occasion.
Bryon and Becky Quertermous had us as guests at their lovely wedding and went to a play at the Purple Rose Theater in Chelsea with us. Vicki Hendricks shared a trip to the infamous Mutter Museum in Philadelphia as well as a dinner at the Mummer Museum at the last NoirCon. It was there we also met Scott Cupp.
We met Brian Busby last summer in Stratford and got a tour of his lovely B &; B in a neighboring town.
Megan's events in Michigan have introduced us to Heath and Kim Lowrance, Tribe and Carrie Roca, Mike White and a few others who names are eluding me now.
It is not my intention here to mention everyone I have met at every conference (or hunted down at other times) but just to point out the strange function the Internet has served. I would have met none of these wonderful people in the years predating the Internet. I would never have attended a conference if I didn't think I had a few friends there to spent time with.
Beware Internet friends. I may show up at your door next.
I have been rather aggressive about trying to meet people I know via the blog community and this meeting worked out well for Phil as well since Rob is a university professor with many common interests. I have met many, many people at crime fiction conferences that I exchanged a few words with, but I especially treasure the people I have been able to spend more than a few minutes with.
Friends like Terrie Moran who made us so welcome in Florida when we were considering spending a winter there a few years back. Terrie is a person we struck an immediate rapport with-who wouldn't?
Or Sandra Scoppettone who traveled for hours to meet me for lunch in New York a few years ago. She has continued to give me advice and succor ever since.
People like Naomi Johnson who took an afternoon off to show me Columbus and take me to lunch. The same goes for Margot Kinberg and Barrie Summy out in San Diego.
Or Bonnie Lawson who shared coffee and book talk with me in D.C.
George Kelley and his wife, Diane, have met us at Niagara on the Lake for a play and bookstore visits and had dinner with us twice. Jeff and Jackie Meyerson have done that too as well as being our companions on trips to New York. A great tour of Brooklyn was part of the fun.
Cullen Gallagher has met up with us in New York and Philadelphia and is as charming as he seems online. Kieran Shea has exchanged Ocean City, New Jersey memories with me on more than one occasion.
Bryon and Becky Quertermous had us as guests at their lovely wedding and went to a play at the Purple Rose Theater in Chelsea with us. Vicki Hendricks shared a trip to the infamous Mutter Museum in Philadelphia as well as a dinner at the Mummer Museum at the last NoirCon. It was there we also met Scott Cupp.
We met Brian Busby last summer in Stratford and got a tour of his lovely B &; B in a neighboring town.
Megan's events in Michigan have introduced us to Heath and Kim Lowrance, Tribe and Carrie Roca, Mike White and a few others who names are eluding me now.
It is not my intention here to mention everyone I have met at every conference (or hunted down at other times) but just to point out the strange function the Internet has served. I would have met none of these wonderful people in the years predating the Internet. I would never have attended a conference if I didn't think I had a few friends there to spent time with.
Beware Internet friends. I may show up at your door next.
Forgotten Movies: Seconds
This movie got a second life a few years back when it was briefly rereleased in arthouses. A very untypical outing for Rock Hudson and perhaps one of his best. It's a science fiction flick and a very good one.
When man grows tired of his humdrum life, he is approached by a group called THE COMPANY who offer to give him a new one: new body, friends, wife, profession, etc. Rock plays the new character and his new life at first seem like a good fit. Of course, things begin to go awry pretty quickly. This film was made in 1965 and directed by John Frankenheimer, based on a book by David Ely. I saw it not long ago and was impressed with its style and substance.
When man grows tired of his humdrum life, he is approached by a group called THE COMPANY who offer to give him a new one: new body, friends, wife, profession, etc. Rock plays the new character and his new life at first seem like a good fit. Of course, things begin to go awry pretty quickly. This film was made in 1965 and directed by John Frankenheimer, based on a book by David Ely. I saw it not long ago and was impressed with its style and substance.
Monday, October 08, 2012
What Movie Disappointed You Most?
THE PHANTOM MENACE didn't just disappoint those of us who saw the original movies when they debuted in the late seventies and early 80s. It will disappoint children for decades to come. It will make them think, this came first since it's chronologically first.How could the team that put this mess together go so wrong?
What movie disappointed you as much?
NOTHING MATTERS by Steve Finbow-Free
And read Brian Lindenmuth's thought about it here. Snubnose is trying to do what traditional publishers don't do with this one: publish noir poetry. Isn't this what we thought ebooks might be about?
Sunday, October 07, 2012
Saturday, October 06, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













