Friday, September 09, 2022

THE CASE OF THE LUCKY LEGS, Erle Stanley Gardiner

 (review by Sarah J Wesson)

THE CASE OF THE LUCKY LEGS, Erle Stanley Gardiner

While Earle Stanley Gardiner can hardly be called a forgotten author, nor Perry Mason a forgotten character, the books that first introduced these icons to the public appear to be fading from memory. Or at least they are in my library, where most of them have been relegated to the large print shelves so that the patrons who grew up reading about the singular cases of the granite-hard defense attorney can enjoy them without squinting.

The earliest Gardiner in our collection is The Case of the Lucky Legs. First published in 1933, it was the fifth of what would be roughly eighty-two Perry Mason adventures. Stilted by our standards, with rigid standards of grammar and punctuation, and---heaven forbid---not a few adverbs, this mystery still grabs the imagination and keeps it there until the last page.

The case starts with a provocative photograph of a pair of shapely female legs, sent to the lawyer by a prominent businessman, who wants Mason to do something about a fraud that has hurt a young lady of his acquaintance. It seems that a movie studio man has been conning innocent girls into competing in a Lucky Legs contest, the winner of which is promised a screen career that never materializes. Unfortunately, there is no legal recourse unless the con man confesses.

Unlike the televised, post World War II Perry Mason who has entered our cultural lexicon, the Perry Mason of the 1930s wasn't afraid to get his hands or his ethics dirty---he basically agrees beat a confession out of the huckster, though he does pause to square this plan with the county prosecutor before heading to the man’s hotel. In the lobby, he bumps into a frightened young lady with good-looking gams, so it comes as no surprise---to the reader or our hero---that Mason discovers the murdered body of the con man. Moments before the police arrive, alerted by a neighbor who heard a woman’s screams, Mason extracts himself by a bit of slick trickery and gets to work.

It seems odd that Perry Mason doesn’t set foot in a courtroom in Lucky Legs---he didn't settle into regular trial work until later in the series. It’s clear that Gardiner is till getting to know his character and hadn’t quite settled on his formula. But Mason does tamper with a crime scene, trap himself in a legal corner or two, smoke enough to stun a camel, and bring the murderer to justice at the fifty-ninth minute of the eleventh hour despite numerous red herrings. Furthermore, his client is as lovely and clueless as they come and the man footing the bill is an interfering, opinionated pain in the tuchus. Della Street is smart, sassy, and loyal, while Paul Drake is hangdog, hungry, and resourceful.

These are among the golden elements that have kept Perry Mason going for almost eighty years. They’re well worth a revival, not only as the prototypes to modern legal procedurals or slices of social history, but as terrific who-on-earth-dunnits.

I confess that I check out these books fairly often to keep them off the weeding reports. If that's a crime, I doubt even Hamilton Berger, Mr. Mason's D.A. foil and frenemy, could bring himself to prosecute.



Margot Kinberg said...

It's been far too long since I read the Perry Mason stories, Patti. You've reminded me that they can be quite good and are worth the read.

pattinase (abbott) said...

And I have never read one. I am going to download one to my kindle. My mother read them all the time.

Todd Mason said...

Relegated to large print is a bit of a disservice...LP books average rather good, I'd say...and don't necessarily trend older books.

I've never read a Mason novel, yet, mother, too, was a fan.

TracyK said...

I read a lot of the Perry Mason books when I was a preteen and teenager. Recently (last ten years) I have only read two of them. I should read more of them. They are all short books.

I love the idea of the Perry Mason character. He is a hybrid investigator/lawyer where he often spends more time on the investigation, supervising Paul, the investigator, often before a crime has actually taken place. In most of the novels, possibly he did a lot of that sleuthing himself? And yet he supposedly has a normal practice representing corporations and individuals, writing contracts and wills, in addition to defending criminals. If he did all that in real life, he would be working 16 or more hours a day. But that never bothers me when I read the books or watch the show.

In the original TV show, he rarely goes all the way to trial but finds the real criminal while the case is still in the preliminary hearing.

pattinase (abbott) said...

I have heard many cases settle before trial. Yet few novels show that. Most feel the trial is the thing, but perhaps not.

Alice Chang said...

Familair Drama, both words streesed equally, in prose or actual drama.