From the archives
Charlie Stella's review
THE BOY WHO FOLLOWED RIPLEY, Patricia Highsmith
Hedonism or Good Deed Doing?
Dark
without gratuitous violence and as existential as it gets, The Boy Who
Followed Ripley was (and remains) a wonderful Patricia Highsmith
psychological thriller that makes the reader wonder yet again just what
it is that motivates her wonderfully dark creation, Tom Ripley. If he’s
supposed to be just another hedonist, it doesn’t show in this brilliant
offering. Tom shows signs of genuine humanity when dealing with a
runaway young man (Frank Pierson, age 16) who has crossed the ocean in flight from patricide (after shoving his wheelchair bound, very wealthy, dear old dad off a cliff).
Never
mind the spoilers here, amici; this book is too good not to read
(although I’ll do my best to leave you somewhat hanging). This Ripley
installment takes place during the Carter (here) Chirac (there)
years when Tom is married to a wealthy young French woman (Heloise) and
living in France in Ripley’s estate (Belle Ombre). Tom still deals in
the world of high end art (frauds and otherwise) and hasn’t lost his
sense of survival (at any cost). Whether or not he’s a sociopath is a
good question since he thinks/discusses his past murders (yeah, plural)
as if he were thinking/talking about cars he’s owned. Although his
first and most famous murder, that of Dickie Greenleaf, can at times
still haunt Tom, it’s not like he regrets clubbing the rich S.O.B. to
death (although let me point out that he does, in fact, regret clubbing a
Mafioso, one of his later murders, to the same end).
Ripley
is the ultimate survivor who once had nothing more than a suitcase and
some clothes, but by book four, through a combination of cold blooded
murder(s), an ability to adapt and learn, connections earned through his
reputation and (no doubt) a ton of luck, now has everything.
So why take
up with this kid who has sought him out from across the Atlantic? Ah,
there’s the rub. Has he suddenly become, as the man behind the curtain
once put it, a “good deed doer”? Or does Tom see some of himself in
young Frank Pierson, a boy who wasn’t exactly crazy about his father but
didn’t hate him either; a boy who just might have spotted a golden
opportunity when dear old dad was taking his usual gander at a sunset
from his favorite spot a few feet from a deadly drop to the rocks way
down below.
Tom
decides to help the boy evade his family for a few days and puts him up
until a pair of suspicious characters he thinks might be kidnappers
appear on the scene. Tom then takes Frank to Berlin in an attempt to
evade the pursuit of those potential bad guys and the detective the
Pierson family has hired to find young Frank. One can only assume it’s a
temporary game Tom is involved in; perhaps he misses the intrigue of a life on the run or maybe it’s the potential danger of having
his name splashed across the headlines once more in his controversial
life, but help Frank Mr. Ripley does (with the caveat that the boy will
return to America and his family and the girlfriend Frank is not quite
sure really likes him).
A
few days on the seamier side of Berlin with some wild nights in a few
gay bars, some dealings with people living on the fringe and then a
kidnapping and what to do about it makes The Boy Who Followed Ripley a
thoroughly entertaining read which will probably find you returning to
book one in the
series in an attempt to understand this wonderfully complex character
who seems to know how to get things done (whatever the cost) and barely
flinches in doing so.
There’s
more to the story following the kidnapping. The world of Ripley
doesn’t portend many happy endings and I’m not about to let you in on
the secret(s), but at least in this adventure we can sense Tom’s heart
does in fact beat almost, not quite, like the rest of ours.
I
never would have thought I could so thoroughly enjoy a crime novel
where I had to search for curse words and/or graphic violence, but it’s
back to book one in the series for this reader. Highsmith’s Ripley is a mesmerizing character fully deserving of our attention (in whatever order we read him).
5 comments:
Oh, I need to read this, Patti. I do like Highsmith's work, and this is one I've not (yet) read.
I've read all the RIPLEY novels and this is one of the best!
I have yet to read The Talented Mr.Ripley, but I plan to. Then I will see if I want to try other Ripley books.
Definitely start there.
I've read the Ripley novels but very little else of her work, something I need to correct. It's good to see that her popularity and influence survives 25 years after her death. My favorite crime novel of this year (so far), WHO IS MAUD DIXON?, a first novel by Alexandra Andrews, shows a definite Highsmith influence.
Post a Comment