KINGSBLOOD ROYAL by Sinclair Lewis
(Review by Deb)
(Review by Deb)
When Sinclair Lewis’s Kingsblood Royal
was originally published in 1947, its subject matter was considered so
controversial that the first edition’s dust jacket contained no endnotes
and not a single inkling about the plot. Some
66 years on, as we enter the second term of America’s first black
president, a novel about a white man whose comfortable existence is
upended when he discovers that a distant ancestor was black might seem
little more than quaint; but it is a good reminder that for several
centuries our country was shaped by a notion that “one drop of black
blood makes you black” and all the pernicious psychological, legal,
social, and cultural baggage that went with that concept.
Books like Robert Penn Warren’s Band of Angels—involving females who are (or think they might be) of mixed-race ancestry—flourished in the early and mid-20th century. In
countless novels, the theme of the “beautiful, tragic mulatto” was
played out for all its taboo-teasing, sexual, and sentimental worth,
usually ending with the heroine’s death. Sinclair Lewis turns this trope on its head—because the main character of Kingsblood Royal
is a man and one who, until he learns the truth about his ancestry, has
lived the life of entitlement that came to white middle-class American
males in the years immediately following World War
II.
Neil Kingsblood is a veteran of that war, one who walks with a limp due to injuries sustained in the fighting. He works in a bank and has married the bank president’s daughter, the aptly-named Vestal. The couple have a young daughter and live in a house in a new development in the city of Grand Republic, Minnesota. There’s plenty of Main Street/Babbitt
material here and Lewis makes good use of it (although, to say that
Lewis’s satire here is a little heavy-handed is putting it mildly),
introducing us to the leading lights of the town, all of whom are
obvious buffoons, hypocrites, lechers, drinkers, and philistines of the
first order.
Lewis first describes Neil in a way that makes him seem similar to his fellow citizens: a
bluff, hearty, hail-fellow-well-met type whose mind is too clumsy to
analyze his occasional discontent with the outwardly happy life he has
chosen (or has it been chosen for him by virtue of his race, gender,
class, and upwardly-mobile marriage?). The
book leisurely develops Neil’s story—we meet his family, friends,
neighbors, co-workers, bank customers, and how Neil interacts with all
of them. We are almost 100 pages
into the book before Neil, at his father’s urging, begins to research a
family legend: could it possibly be true that the Kingsbloods are
descended from Henry VIII? Of
course, that story has no basis in fact, but while looking into his
family’s roots, Neil discovers that one of his ancestors was a black man
born in Martinique. The fact
that this makes Neil all of 1/32 black seems utterly irrelevant to the
modern reader, but in the strictly-segregated world of the late 1940s,
Neil’s life is changed irrevocably by his discovery.
At
this point, we understand why Lewis has spent 100 pages leading up to
the moment of discovery; why early in the book there were long passages
in the book detailing the Kingsbloods’ fraught relationship with their
live-in black housekeeper and her flashy boyfriend or why Neil has spent
quite a bit of time wondering about the interior life of the black
porter who greets all of the train passengers by name; or even why the
book contains a anecdote (presumably one that would have been considered
funny in 1947) about the then-common practice of giving black dogs the
name “Nigger” and the unsuccessful attempts the Kingsbloods make to
rechristen their dog “Bandit.” Neil
has been looking at racial prejudice from the lofty vantage point of
someone uninvolved by its real, cruel
consequences; but in the space of a few hours, Neil has moved from one
side of the racial divide to the other. In his mind, he is now part of
the world that includes housekeepers, porters, shoe-shiners, and even
the quiet black doctor he has met through his work at the bank securing
loans for veterans.
Lewis cleverly communicates Neil’s shock at his discovery: while
Neil travels on the train back home after learning about his ancestry,
his half-formed thoughts dart hither and yon in complete confusion and
contradiction for several pages. At
first he pledges he will never tell a soul; then he decides he will
admit the truth; then he worries about what Vestal will do once she
knows (in many parts of the United States at this time it would have
been illegal for Vestal to be married to a man of mixed race). Neil’s
outward appearance—red-headed, blue-eyed—has not changed; neither has
his daughter’s blond and pink coloring altered, but Neil’s perception of
himself and his child has
changed utterly. He has so
internalized the insidious indoctrination of his society—that being
non-white is to be inferior and being any fraction non-white ancestry
makes a person inferior—that he can no longer see himself living as a
white man—although he realizes that to remain silent and continue to be
white would be the “safe” thing to do. Neil
also believes that his fellow citizens will be able to “see” that he is
now black as he carefully examines the texture of his curly red hair
and checks his fingernails for what he has been told are tell-tale
bluish cuticles. The fact that
nobody has previously been able to determine Neil’s ancestry does not
change Neil’s belief that now he knows the truth, others will be able to
discern it also.
I found the book palled to a certain degree after Neil decides to publicly admit his heritage. A number of predictable things happen: job
loss, social ostracism, family anger (none of Neil’s siblings want to
acknowledge their heritage), a divorce, a broken engagement, the death
of Neil’s father being blamed on the stress of the situation, a mob
gathering to try to force Neil to leave his home in an all-white suburb. I
felt that Lewis had initially painted Neil too much as a “get along to
go along” type to make his transformation into a courageous civil rights
crusader completely believable. I also had a little bit of The Help déjà-vu: why
is a white character always given more credit for doing things that the
black characters have been doing, under far more onerous circumstances,
for their entire lives? On the
other hand, even if Lewis’s intentions outstripped his execution when he
wrote this book, when we look at the long, complicated history of race
in our nation’s history and consider how far we’ve come in just over
half a century, this book is less a curiosity than an important time
capsule that has perhaps been unjustly forgotten.
A book Phil was reading about Pat Nixon mentioned this story and I had to pull this collection out again. Peter Taylor was a terrific writer who wrote mostly short stories although I well remember reading his novel, A SUMMON TO MEMPHIS. And this story, THE OLD FOREST takes place in Memphis too. Taylor has an interesting way of framing the story: he looks back on it from old age and by doing this he deprives the story of a certain tension, but instead focuses the reader on the elements he wants to emphasize. Class, gender, culture.
Nat is a recent college graduate, now working for his father, and also recently engaged to a very nice girl--the kind of girl Memphis society expects him to make his wife. In Memphis in the late thirties, rich boys often had dalliances of various depths with town girls, even while engaged to others. The town girls were not necessarily loose girls but rather just not debutantes. Often they were smarter and more fun than the girls the boys eventually married. Nat invites one he has a relationship of sorts with to accompany him on a trip to his Latin class. They get into an accident and Lee Ann disappears. Everyone wonders what Nat's part in her disappearance is, including his fiance, of course. It is she who eventually takes the situation in hand. Nat comes across as a callow youth, unequal to either woman, who between them straighten things out.
This is an interesting look at class and gender in the late thirties in Memphis. There is a mystery of sorts but the real mystery is why people married people who were their social equals rather than the ones who they desired, found interesting, loved. Well worth reading Taylor to discover the social norms of the time.
This collection includes several other short stories as well.
Sergio Angelini, THE CASE OF THE LATE PIG, Margery Allingham
Joe Barone, DEATH OF A COZY WRITER, G. M. Malliet
Les Blatt, THE CHINESE ORANGE MYSTERY, Ellery Queen
Brian Busby, AIR FARE: THE ENTERTAINERS ENTERTAIN, Allan Gould
Bill Crider, I'LL FIND YOU, Richard Himmel
Scott Cupp, THE SORCERER'S HOUSE, Gene Wolfe
Martin Edwards, THE CASK, Freeman Wills Croft
Curt Evans, THE BARONET WHO CRIED WOLF: TWICE DEAD, John Rhode
Ed Gorman, THE BIRTHDAY MURDER, Lange Lewis
Randy Johnson, COPP FOR HIRE, Don Pendleton
Nick Jones, MY ENEMY'S ENEMY, Kingsley Amis
George Kelley, CHECKPOINT CHARLIE, Gerard de Villiers
Margot Kinberg, THE MYSTERY OF A BUTCHER'S SHOP, Gladys Mitchell
Rob Kitchin THE BIG GOLD DREAM, Chester Himes
B.V. Lawson. THE GREAT MILL STREET MYSTERY, Adeline Sergeant
Evan Lewis, PASSING STRANGE, Richard Sale
Steve Lewis, SHOOT TO KILL, Wade Miller
Todd Mason, GREAT AMERICAN PUBLICATIONS OF 1960
J. F. Norris, VANISHING MEN, G. McLeod Winsor
David Rachels, BLACK WINGS HAS MY ANGEL, Elliott Chaze
James Reasoner, SLETTERY'S HURRICANE, Herman Wouk
Ron Scheer, THE HEART OF THE NIGHT WIND, Vingie E. Roe
Michael Slind, LOOKING FOR RACHEL WALLACE, Robert B. Parker
Kerrie Smith, MAIGRET'S SPECIAL MURDER, Georges Simenon
Kevin Tipple, OF ALL THE SAD WORDS, Bill Crider
TomCat, MURDER AMONG STUDENTS, Ton Vervoort
TODD MASON WILL COLLECT LINKS NEXT FRIDAY. To celebrate five years of forgotten books, I invite anyone who can make the time to write about a forgotten book. I will either post the link or post the review. Let's call Friday, April 19th the date.
12 comments:
Deb, I went through a huge Sinclair Lewis phase when I was a teenager. I read one of Lewis's books after another. I remember feigning illness to stay home from school to finish reading ELMER GANTRY. His later works (perhaps because of his alcoholism) are weak. But Lewis's early works are classics! Nice review!
I haven't read this one by Lewis, although I do enjoy his work.
I think I read every Sinclair Lewis book too. BABBITT stands out particularly as a portrait of a type and also MAIN STREET.
Those names are all but gone now sadly. Sometimes I think that crime fiction writers have a better chance of being rediscovered since they are not so tied to a time.
A somewhat expanded (to include THE SAINT MYSTERY LIBRARY...and CAR LIFE!) version of my Great American Publications in 1960 post is this week's FFB from me...bring 'em on, next week, folks!
Self-conscious audiences, for which there is a great one for crime and fantastic fiction, a voracious but sometimes rather author-blind one for romance, and a rather weak one for historical and contemporary mimetic fiction beyond some "brand-names", help sustain reprints...when the publishers get around to them or finally get them out...
Thanks for including me Patti - I think the link to my review has gone missing though - here it is:
https://bloodymurder.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/the-case-of-the-late-pig-1937-by-margery-allingham/
I'm ready to hang up my reviewer hat. Deb once again impresses me to no end with another literate dissection of a truly forgotten book. And I thought I knew all of Lewis' books. Excellent piece!
ARROWSMITH is the Lewis book I remember. Nice review, Deb.
Jeff M.
Thank you for your kind words, Jeff and John. This was Lewis's second-to-last book published while he was alive--and, as George points out, his alcoholism may finally have caught up with him. I liked the lead-up to Neil's discovery, but after he "comes out," so to speak, the book seemed to lose a lot of steam; or, possibly, living in our much more multi-cultural country, I felt some if the things that happened were fairly predictable--but maybe that's the benefit if hindsight.
Deb
Of, of, of
I hate this keypad!!
Deb
Deb's piece was very well done.
Patti - So kind of you as always to include my post. Thanks
Post a Comment