Check out her numbers on Amazon today and she is still outselling most contemporary writers. But I doubt I need to tell any of you this.
Kerrie Smith (below) extends an invitation to link reviews to her caravan this month. Read her link to see how.
(Review by Deb)
About
me: After being a technical writer for the better part of twenty
years, I was a stay-at-home mom for a while. About ten years ago, I
went back to work in the public school system. I currently work in a
special ed classroom with severely-autistic students. It's challenging
work, but also very rewarding. I love to read across all genres, but
mysteries are my favorite.
I
realize how improbable it would be to know Agatha Christie solely
through this one novel, first published in 1967; but, in the unlikely
event that you were only aware of Christie as the author of ENDLESS
NIGHT, you would be hard-pressed to connect her with the creator of Miss
Marple, Hercule Poirot, and the village "cozies" with which her name is
most often associated. ENDLESS NIGHT is atypical for Christie, a novel
in which frank sexual passion is a driving force and a vague
supernatural menace permeates the atmosphere. It is the closest thing
to noir that Christie ever wrote.
In
first-person narration, we meet Michael Rogers, a twenty-something
working-class drifter who has held multiple jobs, always losing them
because of his inability to control his restless, impulsive nature (today
he'd certainly be diagnosed with ADD/ADHD). Despite his poverty,
Michael is a man who enjoys the finer things and has a great eye for
art, although he obviously cannot afford the abstract canvases that move
him. He spends money when he has it (sometimes by betting on long
shots at the track) and has no desire to follow his mother's admonition
to settle down at one job and start saving for the future.
While
he is working as a chauffeur in Europe, Michael meets Rudolf Santonix, a
world-famous architect. Despite the gulf between their backgrounds and
professions, an unexpected friendship springs up between the two
because of Michael's innate understanding and appreciation of Santonix's
artistic vision--which, Santonix freely admits, requires a great deal
of money to implement. Later, while working in Devon, Michael becomes
enchanted by a piece of land known as "Gipsy's Acre." According to
local lore, the land was cursed by the band of gypsies who were driven
off it years before. In the passages describing Gipsy's Acre,
Christie's powers are in full effect--allowing us to discern something
ominous and unsettling in the mysterious wind-swept beauty of the land.
During
a subsequent visit to Gipsy's Acre, Michael encounters a young American
woman named Ellie and they strike up a conversation. This leads to
several dates, although they meet secretly to avoid interference from
Ellie's protective and disapproving family. As soon as Ellie comes of
age and into a large inheritance, she and Michael marry. There are some
interesting scenes as Michael discovers the extent of Ellie's wealth
and meets the people it takes to manage such a vast amount of money,
particularly Ellie's urbane lawyer, Andrew Lippincott.
Michael
also has to navigate the tricky move from English working-class to
upper-class (noticing, for example, that the shabby clothes and
broken-down vehicle of a neighbor, Major Phillpot, do not prevent him
from being the community's de facto social leader). Despite the class
snobbery that was often apparent in Christie's books, here she lets us
feel some sympathy for the fish-out-of-water Michael as he attempts to
come to grips with who he is in the society he has entered as a result
of his wife's money. I would guess that Agatha Christie chose to make
Ellie an American in part to leave Michael alone in dealing with these
issues; being an American, Ellie is less aware of the difficulties of
transcending the English class structure.
Knowing
Michael's love of Gipsy's Acre, Ellie purchases the land for them and
hires Rudolf Santonix to build their dream house on the site. But
things start to go wrong: A local woman repeatedly warns Ellie that she
will suffer if she stays on Gipsy's Acre; Michael argues constantly
with Gretchen, Ellie's bossy best friend who has come to stay for an
open-ended visit; Andrew Lippincott asks Michael enigmatic questions
about his background and acquaintances; and anonymous acts of vandalism
are committed, all of which seem aimed at driving the couple out of
their home and off Gipsy's Acre.
Amid
this turmoil, a death occurs: a tragic accident--or is it something
more sinister? I really can't say much beyond this without giving away
the rest of the plot, especially a very surprising (to me, at least)
twist. Some readers who are more perceptive than I may guess the
"shocking revelation" before it is explained, but I must admit I was
caught off guard the first time I read it. This is one of those books
that makes you want to start rereading immediately after finishing to
see how Christie makes excellent use of what Robert Barnard calls her
"talent to deceive" as misdirection and casually-dropped clues (not to
mention a few red herrings) lead us away from what is actually
happening.
So,
if you're in the mood for a Christie where the solution to the crime
does not involve missing buttons, broken shoe buckles, or clocks being
turned back ten minutes (not that there's anything wrong with that),
ENDLESS NIGHT is the book for you.
Incidently,
there was a fairly good movie adaptation of ENDLESS NIGHT made in 1972,
featuring Hywel Bennett, Hayley Mills, Britt Ekland, and George Sanders
(in one of his last roles). It is available for instant viewing on
Netflix, but I would strongly recommend not watching it until you've
read the book.
PERIL AT END HOUSE, Patti Abbott
This is an excellent book in which to find a prime example of the plotting that made Christie a master of a certain type of mystery. Her ingenuity and puzzle- master mind is on display in aces at PERIL AT END HOUSE.
Detective Hercule Poirot and Captain Arthur Hastings are spending a weekend at a hotel in a seaside town in Cornwall. Poirot is once again claiming to his friend that his days as a detective are at an end when they meet the novel's central character. Nick Buckley is a young woman who can ill afford the house that looms in the distance, End House. She confesses to Poirot that she has met with three near misses lately and Poirot immediately decides these incidents are not accidents but attempts on her life. Nick's wealthy, aristocratic inner circle comes under immediate scrutiny and a distant cousin is brought to End House to provide Nick with protection. Before very long, Maggie, the cousin, mistaken for her Nick, lies dead. There are letters, wills, eavesdropping, addicts and all the classic tropes the classic British mystery excelled in. END HOUSE is a wonder in its plotting. What it lacks in character, it makes up for in its ability to keep you guessing and interested. Oh for a tenth of her ability to plot.
Agatha Christie, THE ABC Murders (1936) Jeff Meyerson
I had a tough time deciding which Christie book to write about today. Should it be the first I'd read, And Then There Were None (certainly a fine choice) or her first novel, The Mysterious Affair at Styles (1920) or one of her most famous, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd or Murder on the Orient Express?
Or perhaps I should go with one of the short story collections. I read
most of these a very long time ago. We first went to London on our
belated honeymoon in April of 1971 and while there we saw The Mousetrap (then in its 19th year!) and bought two of her books more or less at random, the late Poirot book The Clocks and the better Miss Marple The Body in the Library. I've read over 80 of her books, mostly in the first half of the 1970's. In the end I decided on this one.
The ABC Murders is not your typical
Poirot book, despite the presence of his Watson, Captain Hastings, and
Inspector Japp. For one thing, there are different points of view,
including Hastings, the unknown serial killer, and a man who seems to be
the prime suspect, Alexander Bonaparte Cust. A series of murders takes
place, each in alphabetical order, first Alice Ascher in Andover. Each
has a copy of the ABC railway guide by the body. And Alexander
Bonaparte Cust (initials ABC), a traveling salesman prone to blackouts,
was in each of the places on the day in question. Could he be the
"madman" who is sending Poirot taunting notes?
[I suppose I should give a SPOILER ALERT here for those who haven't read it.]
Naturally, Poirot figures out that the killer isn't
Cust or a random madman but a very clever (if not quite clever enough)
killer with a definite motive. If you've watched any television crime
shows I can guarantee you've seen the ABC pattern used over and over
again, and an astute reader and viewer will be able to spot it. I am
not claiming Christie invented it (I have no idea who did) but she did
perfect it here. And I think I will stop here before further spoiling a
book you should definitely read.
Christie wrote a number of classics during her long
career and this is definitely one of them. Her books do not need to be
read in order but if you're picking out a few to try, put this on your
list. Jeff Meyerson
THE BODY IN THE LIBRARY, Ed Gorman
Ed Gorman is the author of the Dev Conrad and Sam McCain series of crime fiction books. You can find him right here.
Some of the reviews of this novel, written at the time of its publication, will make you smile. Replace Poirot with an old woman named Miss Jane Marple? How"unrealistic" she is as a detective. As if Poirot is an exemplar of hardbitten realism. (I've always preferred Jane to Hercule.)
This is my favorite Christie novel for three reasons. First she obviously set out to ransack the cliche set-up of the mysterious body found in an unlikely place, in this case the library of an upright, upper class couple whose social reputation is beyond question.
Second because in looking into the background of the dead young woman Christie examines both the class system--not only is the young woman's corpse a problem, so is her lower order upbringing, as disturbing in its way as death itself--and the show business life she lead.
Which leads into point number Three. Suspects include people at a nearby posh hotel where the dead woman was (among other duties) a substitute dancer in the nightly cabaret. Christie's social eye and ear are as good for the realm of lower order performers as they are for pompous upper class members who pay to see them.
But Christie being Christie she has to do a little trashing of the moderne which takes the form of a young Londoner who uses his home here for wild assignations and parties. He is connected to the film industry which makes him a fitting target for Christie's satiric side. Film industry? You mean boorish idlers who deflower naive young women and plunder otherwise happy marriages?
As I mentioned some of the initial reviews knocked the novel for its unrealistic detective (Jane Marple) and plotting. I ran across a quote from that most excellent writer Robert Barnard that makes the case for the book very well. "Bravura performance on a classic situation. St Mary Mead regulars figure in the case, pleasantly diversified by fashionable seaside hotel guests and the film crowd. If you think what happens to the body after death is unlikely, try the more 'realistic' P.D. James' An Unsuitable Job for a Woman."
THE BODY IN THE LIBRARY, Ed Gorman
Ed Gorman is the author of the Dev Conrad and Sam McCain series of crime fiction books. You can find him right here.
Some of the reviews of this novel, written at the time of its publication, will make you smile. Replace Poirot with an old woman named Miss Jane Marple? How"unrealistic" she is as a detective. As if Poirot is an exemplar of hardbitten realism. (I've always preferred Jane to Hercule.)
This is my favorite Christie novel for three reasons. First she obviously set out to ransack the cliche set-up of the mysterious body found in an unlikely place, in this case the library of an upright, upper class couple whose social reputation is beyond question.
Second because in looking into the background of the dead young woman Christie examines both the class system--not only is the young woman's corpse a problem, so is her lower order upbringing, as disturbing in its way as death itself--and the show business life she lead.
Which leads into point number Three. Suspects include people at a nearby posh hotel where the dead woman was (among other duties) a substitute dancer in the nightly cabaret. Christie's social eye and ear are as good for the realm of lower order performers as they are for pompous upper class members who pay to see them.
But Christie being Christie she has to do a little trashing of the moderne which takes the form of a young Londoner who uses his home here for wild assignations and parties. He is connected to the film industry which makes him a fitting target for Christie's satiric side. Film industry? You mean boorish idlers who deflower naive young women and plunder otherwise happy marriages?
As I mentioned some of the initial reviews knocked the novel for its unrealistic detective (Jane Marple) and plotting. I ran across a quote from that most excellent writer Robert Barnard that makes the case for the book very well. "Bravura performance on a classic situation. St Mary Mead regulars figure in the case, pleasantly diversified by fashionable seaside hotel guests and the film crowd. If you think what happens to the body after death is unlikely, try the more 'realistic' P.D. James' An Unsuitable Job for a Woman."
Joe Barone
Bill Crider
Dorothy Hayes
Jerry House
Randy Johnson
Nick Jones
Lois Karlin
George Kelley
Rob Kitchin
B.V. Lawson
Steve Lewis
Todd Mason
Neer
J.F. Norris
Patrick Ohl-see Kevin Tipple
Richard Pangburn
James Reasoner
Richard Robinson
Kerrie Smith
Kevin Tipple
Prashant Trikannad
And other Forgotten Books
Brian Busby
Scott Cupp
Martin Edwards
Curt Evans
Nick Jones
Evan Lewis
Richard Pangburn
Ron Scheer
Michael Slind
TomCat
20 comments:
Patti, thank you for including the link to my post. It's fascinating to walk down the Agatha Christie hall of fiction and reading the numerous views and reviews of her novels here. Plays, readings, movies, TV serials, graphic novels, blog posts...Christie's work has seen it all.
Nicely said, Patti.
This makes me want to go back to my Christie books... Her books made me fall in love with mysteries.
Great stuff, Patti! And thanks for the non-Christie link; I have another book this week which might also be of interest: The Big H by Bryan Peters, alias Peter George, author of Red Alert, the basis for Dr Strangelove. More on him next week.
And on a Christie tip, I've a post
here on the dust jacket designer of Endless Night, including a comment from his granddaughter.
Thanks again!
I had an aunt who read all of her work. I borrowed and read one of hers but I don't remember which one now.
Stop the presses! I have a (late?) entry for today: Clyde B. Clason's Blind Drifts (1937).
Ah nuts! I was hoping for once no dupes. But we got two reviews of THE SECRET ADVERSARY. Oh well... One good thing: more short story collections reviewed than I expected!
I hope I am not too late for the party. Here's a review of Christie's Sparkling Cyanide
http://inkquilletc.blogspot.in/2012/10/forgotten-book-sparkling-cyanide-by.html
Thanks
Patti, thanks again for including a link to my Women of Mystery post. I was surprised by Anna Katharine Green's work and influence on Agatha Christie since I had no knowledge of her. I actually gobbled up Agatha Christies as a young stay-at-home mother as well. I sometimes got annoyed at her red herrings since those were the days when you could actually solve the crime by the clues in the story.
Please feel free to write a review of a forgotten book any time. Always looking for new voices.
Oh dear, I missed the Christie week. I knew you were doing it, and I was planning on reviewing either Sparkling Cyanide or The Secret of Chimneys, but somehow it snuck up on me unawares.
Oh, sorry. Another time perhaps.
ENDLESS NIGHT is one of Christie's under-appreciated landmark books, IMO. Very glad that Deb gave such a thoughtful and smart review ("closest thing to noir she ever wrote" yes, indeed!) on what I consider the best of her final writing period. Much of what followed in the 1960s and 1970s is weak or absolutely dull (CURTAIN does not count as it was written in 1940). Not so with ENDLESS NIGHT, a fine crime novel with some of Christie's most enthralling in depth character work - something which she is often maligned for not having.
Well, I posted my FFB at this link:
http://trackofthecat.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-eighth-circle-by-stanley-ellin.html
But then I remembered the Agatha Christie memo so I also posted this:
http://trackofthecat.blogspot.com/2012/10/agatha-christies-chess-problem-more.html
Jeff - ABC Murders has long been one of my favorites, though I've read it enough times there is no longer any surprise in it. Still well done. Good review.
Patti - Peril at End House is another favorite, at least I recall it fondly, having read it just once, and quite long ago, one of the first of her books I read.
So next week we're back to plain ol' our choice, eh? Any ideas for the next arthur-specific FFB?
Deb - That's one I haven't read, and am unlikely to, since I prefer her Marple, Poirot and T&T novels and shorts, and there are so many of those. Does sound interesting, though. Great review.
Um, that should have been "author-specific". Duh. More coffee...
According to her Autobiography, Christie's own favourite books were CROOKED HOUSE and ORDEAL BY INNOCENCE and she was apparently influenced by the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Graham Green, Charles Dickens and Alexander Dumas, among others.
I was hoping for short story reviews and glad to see there were some. In the 1920's she wrote a bunch of what you could call the "young adventurer" type books, including the early Tommy & Tuppence stuff, THE MAN IN THE BROWN SUIT, etc. Fun to read but definitely silly for the most part.
I often tried to solve the Christies as I read along and occasionally I did. One of those I was proud of figuring out was PERIL AT END HOUSE.
Jeff M.
Patti, just posted mine. Thanks for your patience.
Great review of ENDLESS NIGHT, Deb. You know, to my shock and horror, I don't think I've ever read this. Or if I did it was only once back in the annals of prehistoric time.
I will definitely be reading it sooner rather than later. It sounds very intriguing.
Jeff - THE ABC MURDERS is one of my top five Christie books. When this pattern of murder is used (as it is frequently) it is usually referred to as an ABC crime. If she didn't invent it, she perfected it.
Patti - PERIL AT END HOUSE is the sort of book in which it is hard to really like anyone, but still you keep reading. I do remember when I first read it ages ago, I was shocked by the ending.
Christie's ability to confound is brilliance personified. At least to my mind.
Post a Comment