The Muse
True or false: looking back over my creative work, as a writer, painter, musician, actor, I find it hard to distinguish later what pieces came to me in some mystical (muse-like) way from what pieces came to me through repeated, hard work.This is true for me. The exception being that writing that comes like a ghost in the night sometimes has a more dreamlike quality to it--totally fitting but not necessarily better. What about you.
Sunday, January 27, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Ive had the same experience. Some days the words felt like they were awful and dripping out at a painful pace, yet the next day they read breezy and free. And other days were I felt like I was channeling the muse and the next day saw prose that was dead. That's why I don't worry too much about good days and bad days writing wise as long as I keep having writing days.
And six months later, it can change again. What a puzzlement!
very true about the elapsed-time effect. Still, though, I think that prose I labor over is more likely to read like labored prose...though perhaps several hundred thousand more hours of practice might help... :)
I see your point. Overworked prose is stiff. But I swear some of the stuff that flew into my head should have flown out but I shut the window too quickly.
Everything comes to me in a dream like way. As many can see no hard work goes into my writing what so ever. And it shows. :)
If I look at a piece of writing that I did a year ago, I really couldn't tell you what came from what. And truthfully I find that it isn't as horrible as I would have thought it would be, so I assume that none of it came from me.
The muse appears whenever she's drunk and looking for a good time.
And I should add that she usually shows up when she's slumming it and no one else answers her booty call.
Is it the muse who's drunk or you?
Whatever works to get the magic going.
Post a Comment