A friend said that at one time he had lived in Greece where the movie 'Mama Mia!' was filmed. So I got it. The storyline was of no interest to me, although I'll admit I liked Abba when they were new. Even so, I reallyreally wanted to like it enough to sit through it for the scenery. I could barely manage 30 minutes before quitting. ...
I felt the same way with SEX IN THE CITY. I did like MAMA MIA a bit because it was so joyful and nice to look at, but it did suffer from the same problem as THE MEN. They were having a lot more fun than the audience.
From what you write I'd guess that it is a gimmick film, one of those that centers on some cutesy trick that entertains five minutes and then bores. Why do they do it?
I wanted to like BURN AFTER READING, which also featured Clooney (and he was good), but I just hated it. And I love the Coen brothers, too. In a strictly platonic way of course.
Just last night a group of people were extolling the virtues of BURN AFTER READING and I kept my mouth shut for once. The Coen Bros have made 75% good to great movies. But I hated that one, THE Ladykillers and Hudsucker Proxy. Oceans's Twelve was horrific. Definitely a gimmick film although apparently based on a gimmick book too.
Gee, I liked BURN AFTER READING. Haven't seen GOATS yet, but I plan to.
My experience with movies is usually the opposite; I 'm more often surprised by movies I didn't think I'd like, but do. The most recent that comes to mind was VALKYRIE. Tom Cruise was miscast, but the movie as a whole held up well.
Now that I'm thinking about it, there are several movies I knew I expected to be good, but hated. Their titles aren't coming to mind. Guess I blocked them out.
I didn't care for "The Men Who Stare At Goats", Patti. I tend to like the Coens, though, but their biggest problem is they often get in their own way. "No Country For Old Men" showed what they could really do when they restrained their quirky urges.
Patricia Abbott is the author of more than 125 stories that have appeared online, in print journals and in various anthologies. She is the author of two print novels CONCRETE ANGEL (2015) and SHOT IN DETROIT (2016)(Polis Books). CONCRETE ANGEL was nominated for an Anthony and Macavity Award in 2016. SHOT IN DETROIT was nominated for an Edgar Award and an Anthony Award in 2017. A collection of her stories I BRING SORROW AND OTHER STORIES OF TRANSGRESSION will appear in 2018.
She also authored two ebooks, MONKEY JUSTICE and HOME INVASION and co-edited DISCOUNT NOIR. She won a Derringer award for her story "My Hero." She lives outside Detroit.
Patricia (Patti) Abbott
SHOT IN DETROIT
Edgar Nominee 2017, Anthony nominee 2017
CONCRETE ANGEL
Polis Books, 2015-nominated for the Anthony and Macavity Awards
10 comments:
I do plan to watch this but haven't seen it yet.
A friend said that at one time he had lived in Greece where the movie 'Mama Mia!' was filmed. So I got it. The storyline was of no interest to me, although I'll admit I liked Abba when they were new. Even so, I reallyreally wanted to like it enough to sit through it for the scenery. I could barely manage 30 minutes before quitting.
...
I felt the same way with SEX IN THE CITY. I did like MAMA MIA a bit because it was so joyful and nice to look at, but it did suffer from the same problem as THE MEN. They were having a lot more fun than the audience.
A group of my friends saw THE MEN WHO STARE AT GOATS and said it sucked, Patti. I wanted to like OCEAN'S TWELVE, but it was terrible.
From what you write I'd guess that it is a gimmick film, one of those that centers on some cutesy trick that entertains five minutes and then bores. Why do they do it?
I wanted to like BURN AFTER READING, which also featured Clooney (and he was good), but I just hated it. And I love the Coen brothers, too. In a strictly platonic way of course.
Just last night a group of people were extolling the virtues of BURN AFTER READING and I kept my mouth shut for once. The Coen Bros have made 75% good to great movies. But I hated that one, THE Ladykillers and Hudsucker Proxy.
Oceans's Twelve was horrific.
Definitely a gimmick film although apparently based on a gimmick book too.
Gee, I liked BURN AFTER READING. Haven't seen GOATS yet, but I plan to.
My experience with movies is usually the opposite; I 'm more often surprised by movies I didn't think I'd like, but do. The most recent that comes to mind was VALKYRIE. Tom Cruise was miscast, but the movie as a whole held up well.
Now that I'm thinking about it, there are several movies I knew I expected to be good, but hated. Their titles aren't coming to mind. Guess I blocked them out.
LADYKILLERS remake by the Coen Brothers. Some funny bits, but a bland film.
I didn't care for "The Men Who Stare At Goats", Patti. I tend to like the Coens, though, but their biggest problem is they often get in their own way. "No Country For Old Men" showed what they could really do when they restrained their quirky urges.
Post a Comment