I got nothing today. How about you?
My First Job
In 1966, I returned home to Philadelphia after a botched attempt at elopement during my second semester of college. My parents, learning that I had withdrawn, alerted the state police, and I was eventually tracked down in Virginia after a long Greyhound bus trip from the college in Massachusetts. As I have reported the full story of this escapade elsewhere, I will just say it was a full-scale debacle, expensive for my parents and humiliating for me. Later my children would ask to hear it at family gatherings and find it very amusing. Their misdeeds were minor when compared to this.
The morning after I came home in February 1966, I found the Want Ads (a newspaper section I didn’t know existed till then) of the Philadelphia Inquirer on the kitchen table. Several ads were circled in angry red. Lots of exclamations points decorated it. Most of the ads were for jobs at diners and pizza places or as store clerks in pet stores or Kresge’s, but one was for a job at Curtis Publishing Company in downtown Philadelphia, a bus and a subway ride from my house. I had no idea what the job entailed, but the skills listed seemed basic enough for a high school graduate with one semester of college under her belt. So newspaper in hand, I made my way on public transportation to 6th and Walnut Street. I was hired on the spot. Apparently my one semester in college and decent high school grades has won me the position—a job I soon realized I was ill-equipped to do. I had no idea if the salary listed was reasonable, having never had a full-time job before. ($55.00 a week). My parents had given me no advice on what I could expect and whether I should try to barter them up. So I said nothing, just filled out the paperwork and was shown my desk. Most of the other employees in the large office were forty years my senior.
Curtis Publishing Company was unknown to me although it was a famous Philadelphia landmark. The only downtown buildings I was familiar with were the four major department stores (John C. Wanamakers, Lit Brothers, Gimbels, and Strawbridges) and the handful of elegant movie houses. Center City Philadelphia was ground zero to dozens of well-known movie theatres (today there are just a handful). Clustered in districts on Market, Chestnut, South, and North 8th Streets, these entertainment venues (such as the Boyd, the Fox, the Stanley and the Goldman) lined the sidewalks with blinking lights and glistening facades, drawing thousands of visitors downtown. Many Saturdays, my girlfriends and I traveled down to see first-run movies at these palaces. We would dress up (heels and gloves included) for the occasion as was the custom in the early to mid-sixties. The movies playing there would not make their way to our shabby neighborhood theaters for weeks. They didn’t seem like the same movie at all viewed in the Renel Theater that carried a smell that was not just popcorn.
Curtis Publishing Company, my future place of employment, was founded in 1891, and was a major publisher and home to Ladies Home Journal, The Saturday Evening Post, Country Gentleman, Jack and Jill Magazine and several other notable publications. It was an historic building right across the street from Independence Hall and had features such as the Tiffany-designed “Dream Garden” mosaic, atriums, a lot of bronze fixtures and chandeliers, and other notable architectural elements. It occupied an entire city block and still sits there today. From the floors to the ceilings and everywhere in between, there were exquisite details inspired by the French Beaux-Arts architectural movement. The Dream Garden mosaic, designed by Philadelphia-born artist Maxfield Parrish, is composed of 100,000 pieces of iridescent Favrile glass. The building was 12 stories high.
By the time I arrived at its door in 1966, it was in decline as a first-tier publisher, and various departments had been combined to save money. Many attempts had been made to rescue it with bank loans and money from a multitude of investors, and all of them had failed. Its failure was mostly blamed on a lack of diversification in its publications and the aging population who subscribed to them. Its publications were no competition for magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Vogue, Playboy and Glamour, which had many more subscribers. They looked to be from different centuries. Today, the building still stands it all its glory, but it largely offers services to self-publishing authors.
During my six months in this building, I didn’t notice a single one of the architectural glories it featured. I walked to the bank of elevators that day and took one to Personnel. I was hired in purchasing. None of the departments that had a hope of interesting me had jobs. I had left college thoughtlessly with no idea of what I might do instead. I had hitched my wagon to a cartoon aficionado with no ability to draw. Much like I had given no thought of what I would major in when I traveled off to Massachusetts, I gave no thought on how I would support myself once I left. That would be the concern of my intended husband whose greatest skill was shooting a basketball into my wastepaper basket.
Curtis Publishing Company seemed to think I was someone who could have a fairly responsible job. Or they weren’t exactly flooded with applicants. So within a week or so, after mastering the antiquated adding machine, my job seemed somewhat above my pay grade. When things were delivered to various departments in the building, I marched down to that department and checked that the order was complete and signed for by the department head. Then I went back to purchasing and checked to make certain the bill was correct, and then authorized payment. I expected someone senior to me would check on the process (or at least on my math), but Curtis was so short of personnel by then that no one did. My high school math skills were apparently expected to keep the place afloat. Most of the offices on my floor of the building were either empty or occupied by jocular men who seemed to do little more than banter and flirt. Clearly they could see which was the wind was blowing.
But I soldiered on, spending an hour or more to get to the office each day. My parents decided to ask me to pay room and board since I had cost them a semester’s non-refundable tuition with my stunt. By the time I paid them and my taxes, I could probably have made more money babysitting. As summer drew near, I noticed there was no air-conditioning in my office. Just a couple of lazy ceiling fans that moved Philadelphia’s humid air around. One day a woman in my office had a stroke and died on the gurney.
Around then, I started looking for a new job. My search was sped up when I was accosted by a man in a convertible who blocked by way in crossing a street with his huge car coming home from work. In the sixties in Philly, many screen doors were still open so I swiveled and ran up a walk and into a house. The woman, who was ironing, called the police once I told her what had happened. The police escorted me home and my parents and I decided I would look for a job with an easier trip home.
My next -door neighbor was a lineman for Bell of Pa and suggested I apply for work as a service representative. So that is what I did. My mother worked near the Bell office and would give me a ride. And my pay would be $75 a week. I’d start my three month’s training in two-weeks time.
Unfortunately when I told some of my colleagues at Curtis about my new job and new salary, it created dissent in the office and the next thing I knew two burly men were escorting me out of the building after I bundled my few personal items. We exited via the main door and I finally saw the attractive mural I hadn’t laid eyes on in the six months I worked there.
Richard
Yates wrote two of my favorite novels, REVOLUTIONARY ROAD and THE
EASTER PARADE, but he also wrote this fabulous collection of ten short
stories (among others). Written in the fifties "The Best of Everything"
almost seems like a story written earlier. Were people in their twenties
this naive? This innocent? I have to assume some were.
It is the story of a couple on the day before their marriage is to take place in Atlantic City. The point of view switches between the two of them and you can't help but notice how drastically different they are from each other once you are in their heads. You also realize they don't know each other at all and that their marriage will probably fail quickly.
The woman is a typical middle class young woman working as a secretary. She speaks well and is respected in her office. The man is a step or two down the socioeconomic ladder and has a poor grasp of English, which the woman's roommate makes her constantly aware of, calling he and his friends, "Ratty little clerks."
But for whatever reason, Grace
goes forward with the marriage plans although we sense her worry. Her
roommate, feeling badly about the things she has said about Eddie,
leaves her alone the night before the wedding and Grace plans an early
consummation, feeling this will set things right.
But Eddie has been the man of the hour with his friends at a bachelor party and he is stunned by their good will. You get the feeling he has never been the center of attention before this night. He hurries to Grace's apartment to tell her he is going back to the party and her attempt to seduce him goes to naught.
We understand now that Eddie will
always choose his friends over his wife and that will destroy their
marriage quickly. She goes so far to put his hand on her naked breast.
Nothing.
There is a lot of discussion online about this
story. One teacher said it was the cause of a female student in his
class dumping her boyfriend. Yates' real gift here is capturing the mind
and language of both characters so clearly and with sympathy. Eddie is
not a bad man and Grace is not a snob, but they certainly don't belong
together. They seem to have reached an age when they believe it is time
to marry no matter to whom.
Here is a nice piece by Stewart O'Nan pondering the fate of the writing of Richard Yates. He had an unhappy life and an undeserved disappearance from the shelves. His resurgence in the early nineties quickly died out. A real shame.

(from Matt Paust)
![]() |
| Joe Kapitan |
This story reminded me a lot of the recent movie with Rose Byrne, "IF I HAD LEGS I COULD KICK YOU." It is also about a mother with a troubled child. In this case, her child is autistic and his disease is growing worse. She, and to a lesser extent her husband, is trying to find ways to help him: music lessons, art, etc. He is fearful of being alone in the world yet does nothing to prevent this (though he is only six). The mother is keeping a journal of people she meets that have an oddity too. When a burglar confronts her, she lets him take everything but asks him to return the journal.
A mother of two teenage sons is having a bathroom added to her house. She's taking her elderly dog for a walk when she spots a man who has been stalking her off and on for years. The police claim there is nothing they can do until he commits a crime. Her house is particularly vulnerable right now since it has a hole where work is proceeding. One night he enters the house and she finds him in her fridge. Luckily her son handles him in a very mature way. This was a scary story. The idea that a stalker can keep returning year after year and the police (Florida) don't help. Her husband isn't much help either. Groff has a new collection coming out next year called BRAWLERS. Looks like she has violence on her mind.
(reviewed by Casual Debris in 2012)
Its excellent premise is what attracted me to Anthony Berkeley's original, innovative and highly entertaining Trial and Error.
Mild-mannered Lawrence Butterfield Todhunter learns that due to an
aggressive aneurism he doesn't have much time left on this earth.
Wanting to commit a great, humanitarian act before he goes, he throws a
dinner party and tosses out a hypothetical, which leads nearly everyone
to declare that great can be achieved through murder, so long as the
victim is deserving of death. Hence Todhunter decides that before his
impending doom he must seek out an appropriate victim and commit this
terrible act.
Anthony Berkeley's novel has been out of print for some time, since the
late 1960s it appears, with the exception of a small print run in 2001
by House of Stratus. This is a terrible shame because Trial and Error
is an excellent read, a unique mystery that reads almost like an epic
novel as it spans various significant episodes, each one a small book on
its own, from Todhunter's seeking the perfect victim to the murder
itself and its eventual trial. The book is split into five parts, each
part dealing with a substantial leg in Todhunter's journey. There are a
number of twists and I won't reveal anything more about the central
plot.
The novel also boasts great characters, dialogue and attention to detail
that is simply riveting. The world Berkeley manages to create is very
real, and the geography of the various UK locations are clear; we always
know where we are and where the settings lie in relation to one
another. Moreover, the novel is filled with a good deal of humour
despite its premise and its incessant focus on death. Yet what elevates Trial and Error
from a good British mystery to a great novel is its notions of
absurdity. Throughout the novel is a pervasive sense that despite the
high dramatic aspects of life, both selfish and altruistic actions are
governed by nothing more than chance; no matter how we strive for
control the idea that we can influence destiny, our own or someone
else's, is ridiculous. It is clear that the universe has its plans and
the minutest element can thrust and thwart our plans in any seemingly
random direction. And in the final scene even these ideas are
challenged, as Berkeley twists the entire story into something
altogether different.
Trial and Error
is additionally a success due to its innocuous protagonist. Lawrence
Todhunter is barely a character, a simple man with simple ideas,
impressionable and easily influenced, harmless in every dimension of his
being. While it initially appears that such a character would
undoubtedly fail in maintaining interest in any kind of novel, Todhunter
succeeds in growing on the reader, not necessarily through his
altruism, but through his determination and particularly because he does
indeed transform. Not static at all, this Todhunter. Berkeley also
risks creating an over-sentimental character, particularly as he is
nearing death, and yet does a wonderful job in being direct with his
story and avoiding overblown sentimentality.
The novel's only weak point is at the early stage of the trial, when
Berkeley feels the need to restate details which the reader is already
familiar with. This portion of the work suffers a little in its pacing,
but once the cross-examination begins, the writing, particularly the
dialogue, is so riveting that we nearly forget the slow progress of the
previous thirty or so pages.
Anthony Berkeley's Trial and Error is a rare find that is absolutely worth seeking out
(from Cullen Gallagher)
Editor
John Pelan and publisher Ramble House have set out to restore the long
obscured history of Day Keene in the pulps, embarking on a multi-volume
series inspired by Dennis McMillan's amazing Fredric Brown pulp series.
The first volume in their Day Keene in the Detective Pulps series is League of the Grateful Dead and Other Stories. Released in 2010, it gathers eight tales and an insightful introduction by Pelan.
The eight stories in League of the Grateful Dead
show classic crime pulp at its finest. Tough-as-nails private eyes
navigating twisty (and twisted) capers, engaging in blazing shootouts
with ruthless gangsters, and trying to keep their necks out of jail—all
while making it home for supper without compromising their wedding vows.
They're paced so quickly that it's nearly impossible to keep up or
follow all the clues—but it's sure fun trying. While the private eye
cases are fabulous and most indicative of Keene's characteristic style,
my favorite was actually "Nothing to Worry About," a vicious quickie
tale about a husband's plot to murder his wife that features a wicked
twist ending.
Here's a run-down of the stories.Just started THE DAY OF THE JACKAL (Peacock). I have never seen the movie so I am new to the story. Also watching the new Lynley on PBS, THE PAPER, on Peacock, which I liked moderately. And still making my way through the DOCTOR BLAKE MYSTERIES. I really like that each episode is complete in itself. Nothing to remember the next time.
Went to a great chamber music concert Saturday night. The Zukerman Trio played piano trios by Mendelssohn and Dvorak. We can get very good seats for $30 at a lovely venue. I also spent a beautiful afternoon walking the riverfront in Detroit, which now extends for more than five miles. Windsor, Canada is on the other side and two bridges and a tunnel connect the two.
It is astounding to compare many areas of Detroit to the way they were twenty years ago. Of course, other areas are still in need of help.
And what about you?
It looks like CHINA BEACH is streaming on a new streaming channel called HOWDY, which is $1.99 a month. Some of the original music has been replaced.
Finished the latest season of UNFORGOTTEN, which was good although the third plotline may have been unnecessary. Also finished FISK, which is very funny.
Still slogging through ANTIDOTE by Karen Russell. Just too long but well-written. Rereading THE HOUSEKEEPER AND THE PROFESSOR for my other book group.
Beautiful weather here. Can't remember better weather over this weekend. There are a lot of festivals in Detroit area. A huge jazz festival down on the waterfront and and art festival nearby but crowds don't please me anymore.
Kevin's classes don't start for another few days. Why get them there eight days before when there's nothing to do? And the WI kids probably went home for the holiday weekend.
What are you up to?
Reading RAISING HARE, by Chloe Dalton. I knew nothing about hares before reading this and it is fascinating. Also reading ABSOLUTION BY Alice McDermott.
Watching PRIME TARGET on Apple. Finished POKER FACE. The second season had some real winning episodes. Could not finish DYING FOR SEX on Hulu. Still watching the series on the Mitford sisters. What a handful they were.
What about you?
A package arrives at Norma and Arthur Steward's house with a gadget inside with a button on it. Shortly after a man arrives and announces to the couple that if they push the button they will kill someone in the world, and receive $50, 000 in exchange. Norma is intrigued by this, insisting that they are part of an experiment, and nothing will happen if they push the button. Except maybe they would get paid and could do the many things she was longing for. Arthur is repulsed by the idea and by his wife. This is a very well -written story although you will probably guess the ending. This was, of course, on the Twilight Zone. You can watch it on you tube. It was also the plot of the 2009 movie THE BOX.
Saw two movies this week. THE LIFE OF CHUCK, which I didn't think much of and it hit a little too close to home for comfort.The other was a restoration of THE ANNIHILATION OF FISH with James Earl Jones and Lynn Redgrave. The sound was poor and we struggled to hear it. But it seemed like a nice enough film about old age.
Ate out way too much this week: Mexican, Turkish, Thai, Thai. I don't dare stand on the scale.
Reading THE INVISIBLE LIFE OF ADDIE LARUE for a book group. It is very thick. It certainly seems like people like it so maybe I will too.
Watching DUSTER (Max) STICK (Apple) and OUTRAGEOUS (BritBox) but nothing that really thrills me. I find myself watching compilations of various themes on You tube a lot. FOr instance, the best dancing sequences, the best crime stories. They are inserting anti-abortion commercials in some of them.
Very hot here. Hope it doesn't last long.
What are you doing lately?