(review by Sarah J Wesson)
THE CASE OF THE LUCKY LEGS, Erle Stanley Gardiner
While
Earle Stanley Gardiner can hardly be called a forgotten author, nor
Perry Mason a forgotten character, the books that first introduced these
icons to the public appear to be fading from memory. Or
at least they are in my library, where most of them have been relegated
to the large print shelves so that the patrons who grew up reading
about the singular cases of the granite-hard defense attorney can enjoy
them without squinting.
The earliest Gardiner in our collection is The Case of the Lucky Legs. First published in 1933, it was the fifth of what would be roughly eighty-two Perry Mason adventures. Stilted
by our standards, with rigid standards of grammar and punctuation,
and---heaven forbid---not a few adverbs, this mystery still grabs the
imagination and keeps it there until the last page.
The
case starts with a provocative photograph of a pair of shapely female
legs, sent to the lawyer by a prominent businessman, who wants Mason to
do something about a fraud that has hurt a young lady of his
acquaintance. It seems that a movie studio man
has been conning innocent girls into competing in a Lucky Legs contest,
the winner of which is promised a screen career that never materializes. Unfortunately, there is no legal recourse unless the con man confesses.
Unlike
the televised, post World War II Perry Mason who has entered our
cultural lexicon, the Perry Mason of the 1930s wasn't afraid to get his
hands or his ethics dirty---he basically agrees beat a confession out of
the huckster, though he does pause to square this plan with the county
prosecutor before heading to the man’s hotel. In
the lobby, he bumps into a frightened young lady with good-looking gams,
so it comes as no surprise---to the reader or our hero---that Mason
discovers the murdered body of the con man. Moments
before the police arrive, alerted by a neighbor who heard a woman’s
screams, Mason extracts himself by a bit of slick trickery and gets to
work.
It seems odd that Perry Mason doesn’t set foot in a courtroom in Lucky Legs---he didn't settle into regular trial work until later in the series. It’s clear that Gardiner is till getting to know his character and hadn’t quite settled on his formula. But
Mason does tamper with a crime scene, trap himself in a legal corner or
two, smoke enough to stun a camel, and bring the murderer to justice at
the fifty-ninth minute of the eleventh hour despite numerous red
herrings. Furthermore, his client is as lovely
and clueless as they come and the man footing the bill is an
interfering, opinionated pain in the tuchus. Della Street is smart, sassy, and loyal, while Paul Drake is hangdog, hungry, and resourceful.
These are among the golden elements that have kept Perry Mason going for almost eighty years. They’re
well worth a revival, not only as the prototypes to modern legal
procedurals or slices of social history, but as terrific
who-on-earth-dunnits.
I confess that I check out these books fairly often to keep them off the weeding reports. If that's a crime, I doubt even Hamilton Berger, Mr. Mason's D.A. foil and frenemy, could bring himself to prosecute.
.jpeg)
