Wednesday, December 19, 2012

What Movie's Charms Elude You? LOVE ACTUALLY


I have watched this movie several times in an effort to understand why people are so bonkers about it? Call me a grinch but it but it doesn't work for me at all. Too many story lines that all seem underdeveloped and manipulative. And this is surprising because I love the cast. Maybe the third time will be the charm.

What movie, widely loved, eludes you? (Not necessarily Christmas films).

44 comments:

  1. Neither Pretty Woman nor Four Weddings and a Funeral do anything for me. Both seem derivative and false to me.

    /Bah, humbug!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pretty Woman eludes me too although I do have a soft spot for the other one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:51 AM

    The Truman Show, hands down.

    Peter Weir is a great director and, well, I don't loathe Jim Carrey. It's just that the film creates a world in which Carrey leads his life unaware that he is surrounded by actors, that his oblivious life is actually being broadcast as a TV show. This weird adolescent conceit ("I'm the only one who really FEELS anything!") mingles with the undiscussed but obvious fact that every "actor" around Carrey's character is actively involved in deceiving him on every level, lying to him about everything in his life 24/7/365. That's a unbelievably callous deception that's begs the question of what kind of people could actively create and sustain it.

    I found this film false, awkward and insulting, and it made the cover ot Time with Carrey described as the new Jimmy Stewart.

    John Hocking

    ReplyDelete
  4. When I first saw TTS, I thought it pretty clever. But on a second viewing I found most of the issues you suggest. And over time, I came to dislike Jim Carrey. And to compare him to Jimmy Stewart is ludicrous as I bet TIME would admit to now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:57 AM

    I agree with Deb on those, though the latter was OK. I'd add other Julia Roberts movies including NOTTING HILL, which Jackie likes.

    Although "charm" is not a word that was used for it, AMERICAN BEAUTY was liked by enough people in Hollywood to win several Oscars, including Best Picture. I know we share an opinion of it.

    As for LOVE, ACTUALLY I feel differently. I find it uneven. I like several of the stories and dislike several of the others. So I watch it annually (Jackie loves it), enjoy the Bill Nighy, Liam Neeson, Colin Firth and even Hugh Grant stories (in descending order of enjoyment) and suffer through the rest.

    Here's another: THE HANGOVER. Add any movie starring Jennifer Aniston, Kate Hudson, Gerard Butler, Paul Rudd, Katherine Heigl.

    Jeff M.

    ReplyDelete
  6. These Best Picture winners:

    OUT OF AFRICA
    THE ENGLISH PATIENT
    AMERICAN BEAUTY
    CHICAGO

    There, I said it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm with you and Jeff on AMERICAN BEAUTY. I'm also resistant to all the Judd Apatow movies. I've found them all to be banal.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have a friend whose favorite movie is OUT OF AFRICA. I just don't see it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:20 AM

    No, even Meryl and pretty pictures couldn't make it interesting.

    Jeff M.

    PS - If we're talking Best Picture winners I'd add:

    CRASH
    FORREST GUMP (except for the Bubba and Lt. Dan scenes)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Detest FORREST GUMP and I have to say the book by Winston Groom was very different.

    ReplyDelete
  11. SWEET HOME ALABAMA and MAID IN MANHATTAN though I preferred the latter to the former. Reese Witherspoon was over the top.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There are so many. If I had to pick one, considering the time of the year, I'd go with Elf. Apparently, I'm missing something since this is now some kind of Christmas classic for my generation and younger. I think it fails as a comedy and as a Christmas story, but mostly it's just stupid and not very funny--like pretty much everything with Will Ferrel.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I second Chad. Pretty much anything with Will Ferrell in it. Though to be fair, I stopped watching them after the first couple. I suppose he might have gotten better.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous11:58 AM

    I sort of liked him in STRANGER THAN FICTION but otherwise, no.

    Top of my "why does he have a career" list remains Ben Stiller, but Rob Schneider and Adam Sandler are right up there with him.


    Jeff M.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have never found Ferrell funny but because I read what a nice guy he was I keep trying to like his movies. But I don't.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Jeff, your last comment reads like the one I had in mind. I haven't seen more than a film each by Ben Stiller, Rob Schneider, Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell, John C. Reilly, Ashton Kutcher, Brendon Fraser, and Vince Vaughn. I am think more names along these lines...

    ReplyDelete
  17. If we all agree on these names, who is the audience for these guys? SNL has sent many awful actors into the world.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Steve Carell. He was tolerable in the Streep/Jones movie. But only in light of how awful he usually is.
    And I would add Robin Williams, with a few exceptions: MOSCOW ON THE HUDSON, BIRDCAGE, GOOD MORNING, VIETNAM.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 1. Little Miss Sunshine. A critical fave that bored the hell out of me. Turned it off after only 30 minutes.

    2. Moulin Rouge with Nicole Kidman, et al. Noisy, garish, chaotic.

    In defense of Paul Rudd: He's a fantastic actor who started on the stage doing a lot of dramatic roles. I think he squanders his talent making those crap comedies. He was intense and moving (and funny, too) in GRACE which I just saw on Broadway. An amazing play, BTW, and anyone who is in or near NYC ought to do themselves a favor and see it before it closes on Jan 6.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I guess my main question would be why would you try it more than once if you didn't like it? Much less 3 times? One movie that many folks liked that I tried to watch but never made it through was The Bridges of Madison county.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Believe me Charles, Eastwood's film is way better than the dreck of the novel that is The Bridges of Madison County.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous3:17 PM

    John, I have nothing against Paul Rudd as an actor, other than what you said - he squanders his talent making those crap comedies. We would have seen GRACE long ago if my wife hadn't hurt her leg in Vegas.

    I agree on MOULIN ROUGE and other movies by the incredibly overrated (IMHO) Baz Luhrmann. I'm not holding out much hope for his forthcoming remake of GATSBY.

    On the other hand, I do like LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE and I do (Patti) like Steve Carell, in that and three or four other things.

    Jeff M.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I watched it again because last Christmas everyone raved about it.
    I liked Carell best in THE OFFICE.
    I also like LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE although Phil hated it.
    The trailers for Gatsby look great in terms of costumes, set design, but it's hard to tell. I think it may be unfilmable.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Patti, not a criticism - though it sounds like one I guess - just a comment, as this always fascinates me. You say you've "watched it several times" then later you say "maybe the third time will be the charm." So... "several" equals two? That would be a couple of times, but several? I guess I think of several as being at least three, more likely four or five.

    ++++++++++

    Movie whose charms elude me? E.T. would be one. Almost all "funny" Christmas movies except Christmas Vacation. ELF is a good example. I love A Christmas Story and the old classics. Anything with Jim Carrey. I see a lot of the answers have to do with actors and actresses instead of specific films. which is interesting. I even did it.

    But then so very few films look appealing to me anymore, I don't bother with them, so I wouldn't know if I missed their charms, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I said all that very badly.

    Movie whose charms elude me would include E.T. almost all "funny" Christmas movies anything with Jim Carrey. Most action films too, though I don't know how much charm they have anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I am a very imprecise person, Rick. I think I have seen it twice. So several was clearly an incorrect term to use.
    Most action films elude me too but I liked SKYFALL and THE AVENGERS. They had humor in them and seemed more fully fleshed out.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous6:23 PM

    THE AVENGERS was OK I thought, mainly for the humorous stuff with Robert Downey, but I would certainly not see it multiple times.

    There are movies I can watch repeatedly but they aren't - for the most part - action movies. CASABLANCA, ANIMAL HOUSE, GROUNDHOG DAY, TWO FOR THE ROAD, ANNIE HALL,CHARADE, MY COUSIN VINNY, etc.

    Jeff M.

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Spielberg's jejune, flashy corpus of work. George Lucas's jejune, flashy corpus of work, save, to some extent, THX-1138 and AMERICAN GRAFITTI. Michael Haneke's jejune, self-satisfied, wildly overpraised oeuvre...and, even more ponderously if less self-righteously, Christopher Nolan's.

    SNL does a disservice to too many actors, when their most mechanical routines catch on, and they decide they can Get By with that kind of material (and commercially, they often can). Even Adam Sandler can be better than he usually is, as in PUNCH DRUNK LOVE or the sitcom UNDECLARED. Most of SNL's cast has done better work before and after their term there...but that series has only been actually good in three stretches, and one of those stretches (when the series was all but turned over to Michael McKean, Harry Shearer, Billy Crystal and Martin Short) was only barely actually good, despite the talent involved (Julia Louis-Dreyfus being among those wandering around in the background of Shearer, et al.).

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anything with Sandler, Ferrell, or Glenn Close. I don't watch anything with a member of the Scientology Organized Crime Family in it.

    As for individual titles, there are a number already mentioned, like The English Patient, and I have to say I was totally underwhelmed by Doctor Zhivago. Also, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Bob Ford, if that's correct.

    ReplyDelete
  31. It's interesting, Patti, that you often pose this question as if (or almost as if) there's something wrong with you if you don't like, for example, LOVE ACTUALLY, which is a manipulative trifle.

    Most of the films cited have been. Manipulative trifles can do very well, since most film viewers are not (REVELATION!) terribly sophisticated.

    Ah, well, I hope it's simple politeness on your part.

    ReplyDelete
  32. COWARD ROBERT FORD, fwiw, Bob.

    ReplyDelete
  33. BLACK NARCISSUS. Powell and Pressburger made some great movies, and Deborah Kerr is a terrific actress, and Jack Cardiff is without a doubt one of the greatest cinematographers of all time -- but I find this movie dull beyond compare. It still plays to sell out crowds here in NYC at Film Forum, but I didn't care for it one bit.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Haven't seen it in many years. But it did not stay with me.

    ReplyDelete
  35. THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY. Simply put, I did not find it funny at all.

    Then again, whenever Jonathan Richman comes on the screen it's one of the best things ever.

    ReplyDelete
  36. My mother loved that movie. I didn't get it. Although both Carmen Diaz and Ben Stiller occupy the bottom of my list of actors.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Jonathan Richman's theme song is nevertheless truly, utterly wonderful. Why this did not earn him an academy award is totally beyond me.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5vHRMtEDZU

    Addendum: NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. More craft than art, noir cliches galore and Javier Bardem is basically just a wacky gimmick. The Coen's most overrated, by far. Their most underrated? INTOLERABLE CRUELTY.

    ReplyDelete
  38. So many come to mind, but the one that I seem to be well and truly out of sync on with folks is Moonstruck.

    ReplyDelete
  39. One of those films that worked for me however many years ago. But on second viewing-cringeworthy.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Cameron Diaz. I think she's better than you suggest, but rarely does anything that challenges her (or her costars) much.

    MOONSTRUCK offended me from jump.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Ben Stiller sure does more than his share of pap, but at his best, is by me quite funny. Liked him in GREENBERG, for example (only partly a comedy, and definitely a tragedy).

    ReplyDelete
  42. Both actors seem to settle for very little and yet give the impression of having some brains. I guess there are not many A films around.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Naomi/Todd: Hehe... I'm teeing up MOONSTRUCK this weekend for its 25th anniversary ;-).

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous8:36 AM

    The recent hype and reviews make me add one more name: Quentin Tarantino.

    I find most of his movies not hilarious or retro or (you choose the adjective here) but unwatchable.

    I did love FROM DUSK TO DAWN, however. Go figure. Of course it did have Salma Hayek...


    Jeff M.

    ReplyDelete